Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New York's Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand builds bridges with GOP, raises profile in Washington
NEW YORK DAILY NEWS ^ | AUGUST 10, 2013 | DAN FRIEDMAN

Posted on 08/10/2013 8:21:12 PM PDT by EinNYC

The junior senator has the support of Republican colleagues Rand Paul and Sen. Ted Cruz on a measure to overhaul how the military handles sexual assault allegations. Her work has garnered praise from GOP members as a Democrat they’d like to work with and is helping her own set of issues in Washington.,/i>

WASHINGTON — It was a head-turning sight on Capitol Hill. There was Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, a New York Democrat, standing with firebrand Republican Sens. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) and Rand Paul (R-Ky.) to showcase their support of her measure to overhaul how the military handles sexual assault allegations.

Her relentless campaign for the measure, which landed Gillibrand on “The Daily Show” on Thursday, has helped to transform perceptions of the junior New York senator. "She's being taken seriously," said Norm Ornstein, a scholar at the American Enterprise Institute. "She's clearly raised her profile and become a leader on this." Since 2009, when then Gov. David Paterson appointed her to the seat vacated when Hillary Clinton became secretary of state, Gillibrand has become known as a prodigious fund-raiser, and she has even generated some presidential buzz.

She played a role in enacting some high-profile legislation, most notably a repeal of the Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell law that prevented gays from openly serving in the military, and a bill to pay for medical care for first responders sickened by working at Ground Zero after the Sept. 11 attacks. Still, Gillibrand was privately seen by some as a legislative lightweight, with New York’s senior senator, Democrat Chuck Schumer, coaching her politically and suggesting legislative issues to pursue. With her fight to combat military sexual assault, Gillibrand has established that, win or lose, she has legislative chops.

The Pentagon believes that 26,000 members of the military were sexually assaulted in 2012, but only 3,400 reported attacks.

Under Gillibrand’s measure, military commanders no longer would have the power to decide which sexual assault cases to try. That power would be given to military prosecutors — a step Gillibrand says would increase the number of people who report assaults without fear of retaliation.

In arguing for the bill, Gillibrand has taken on several senior Democrats, including Armed Services Committee Chairman Carl Levin (D-Mich.). At a hearing, she even dressed down members of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

On “The Daily Show,” Gillibrand announced she has 46 backers for her measure, close to the 51 needed for passage — but short of the 60 required to overcome a filibuster. Still, closing in on 50 votes — many from across the aisle — is a legislative achievement. Gillibrand has sought to meet every senator on the issue and the Senate’s August break "gives us more time to make the case," she told the Daily News.

Republicans said her polite persistence, factual command and respectful approach established her as a Democrat they wanted to work with.

“I was persuaded by Sen. Gillibrand’s exceptionally passionate and able advocacy,” Cruz said at the news conference with Gillibrand last month.

Said Paul, “Senator Gillibrand asked to talk to me ... I thought there were one or two things that maybe were included in this that we should exclude (and) she was very open to the discussion."

Support from conservatives like Paul and Cruz shows the bill does not fall into an easy partisan category. It divides lawmakers partly over their willingness to take on the Pentagon.

Gillibrand said she picked the issue because she was “heartbroken” by the stories of victims. Whatever the motive, the push benefits the senator, too.

Gillibrand, who already headed a political action committee to raise money for female candidates around the U.S., is further boosting her standing with women’s groups, said political consultant Hank Sheinkopf.

“She is raising her national profile, and she is raising a lot of money for people,” he said. “That makes her someone in the Senate that people want to talk to.”


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: apaulling; apaulogia; carllevin; chuckschumer; davidpaterson; kentucky; kirstengillibrand; michigan; newyork; paultard; paultardation; paultards; randpaul; randsconcerntrolls; thekycandidate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last
To: EinNYC
Nossir. I shall shoot my mouth off often, but I must advise you, it will not be aimless.

It will be aimed at you.

41 posted on 08/11/2013 1:16:39 PM PDT by Lazamataz (Early 2009 to 7/21/2013 - RIP my little girl Cathy. You were the best cat ever. You will be missed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

Fire away. I have excellent armor against mindless threats from anonymous members of the ether. You’re just a bunch of electrons, buddy. And this after I posted how sorry I was that you lost your cat.


42 posted on 08/11/2013 1:28:52 PM PDT by EinNYC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: EinNYC
Demo-slut Claire McCaskill was on Meet the Press this morning arguing against the Gillibrand/Paul bill. Carl Levin is also against it.

Why are you backing filthy Commie scum Demo-rats like McCaskill and Levin?

43 posted on 08/11/2013 4:00:35 PM PDT by Plummz (pro-constitution, anti-corruption)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Plummz

Who on earth said I was backing McCaskill and Levin? They are scum. So is Gillibrand. Rand Paul and Ted Cruz are not scum. Clear enough for ya?


44 posted on 08/11/2013 7:26:03 PM PDT by EinNYC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Plummz

Who on earth said I was backing McCaskill and Levin? They are scum. So is Gillibrand. Rand Paul and Ted Cruz are not scum. Clear enough for ya?


45 posted on 08/11/2013 7:26:37 PM PDT by EinNYC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: EinNYC

Ah, thank you! You get it.

//////////////
I do get it. Texas is generally a conservative state, but my current members of the TX State Lege, as well as in the US House, are all died-in-the-wool Liberal Dems. No sense in even trying to call their offices or email them. They are not listening.


46 posted on 08/11/2013 8:48:52 PM PDT by man_in_tx (Blowback (Faithfully farting twowards Mecca five times daily).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: man_in_tx

That’s why I don’t even bother to call Schumer, Gillibrand, or Meng’s offices. They are useless.


47 posted on 08/11/2013 8:56:41 PM PDT by EinNYC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: EinNYC

That’s why I don’t even bother to call Schumer, Gillibrand, or Meng’s offices. They are useless.

/////////////
I feel your pain.

In years gone by, I did call Schumer’s office once — got into a lively argument with one of his staffers. Kind of interesting, but nothing gained.


48 posted on 08/11/2013 9:10:31 PM PDT by man_in_tx (Blowback (Faithfully farting twowards Mecca five times daily).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson