I believe Jack Clark. You want to sue me too Albert?
1 posted on
08/10/2013 9:18:19 AM PDT by
FlJoePa
To: FlJoePa
2 posted on
08/10/2013 9:21:45 AM PDT by
onedoug
To: FlJoePa
At least twice in the first week of a program that made its debut Aug. 1, Clark said that former Pujols trainer Chris Mihlfeld told him in 2000 that he shot him up with steroids.
The trainer has denied telling Clark anything of the sort. I like Jack Clark - he played for the Giants when I was a kid, and was one of the few bright spots on some pretty bad teams - but publicly accusing a player of PED usage without firm evidence in your hands isn't very bright, especially if the player has enough money to hire a team of good lawyers.
To: FlJoePa
Former Cardinals icon Albert Pujols said late Friday that he plans to sue former Cardinal Jack Clark...Hey -- it's only an opinion, Albert. UNLESS you believe this allegation leads to a thorough investigation and can o' worms.
5 posted on
08/10/2013 9:45:25 AM PDT by
USS Johnston
(All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. ~ Edmund Burke)
To: FlJoePa
Clark said that former Pujols trainer Chris Mihlfeld told him in 2000 that he shot him up with steroids. Both were working in the Los Angeles Dodgers organization at the time. Clark also has made other steroids allegations about Pujols, attributing them to comments Mihlfeld had made to him more than a decade ago. Can o' Worms: OPENED
6 posted on
08/10/2013 9:47:06 AM PDT by
USS Johnston
(All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. ~ Edmund Burke)
To: FlJoePa
I believe Jack ClarkeThis from a guy who thinks Jerry Sandusky was railroaded and Paterno did nothing wrong. Put down the bong JoePa, put down the bong.
8 posted on
08/10/2013 10:12:26 AM PDT by
tx_eggman
(Liberalism is only possible in that moment when a man chooses Barabas over Christ.)
To: FlJoePa
Ive been tested hundreds of times throughout my career and never once have I tested positive.
Gee, where have we heard that before? Sounds like Albert is channelling Lance Armstrong.
9 posted on
08/10/2013 10:13:48 AM PDT by
Veggie Todd
(Still crazy after all these beers.)
To: FlJoePa
Ive said time and time again that I would never take, or even consider taking, anything illegal, Pujols said. Ive been tested hundreds of times throughout my career and never once have I tested positive.
I believed the last guy that made almost the exact statement, word for word. I believe it is called the Armstrong denial.
13 posted on
08/10/2013 10:38:19 AM PDT by
Cyman
To: FlJoePa
I believe Pujols. Clark is a ninny, and I think he either lied through his teeth, or he’s a ninny.
14 posted on
08/10/2013 10:46:34 AM PDT by
righttackle44
(Take scalps. Leave the bodies as a warning.)
To: FlJoePa
I have to believe Clark on this one. We’ll see if a lawsuit is actually filed. Clark will get the Canseco treatment because of what he’s said, but how many lawsuits were filed against Canseco?
15 posted on
08/10/2013 1:15:26 PM PDT by
Figment
To: FlJoePa
Wow — Jack Clark’s accusation has the same credibility as Louis Freeh’s, except that atleast Louis Freeh’s star witness never publicly dissed him.
Clark’s evidence is what again???
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson