Do you infer the “raw” video at the link was edited?
The local news outlets in the ‘Quad Cities’ ( of which Davenport is a part of) have asked the police to release the entire unedited video complete with audio. Since the crook has made a big deal of it, they are no doubt following State’s Attorney’s counsel to let all the facts speak for themselves in the courtroom.
I listened to WOC this afternoon, with over 3 hrs of local callers with their comments. Easily, 3-1 supporting the cops.
I’m not the person you asked, but yes, it is.
At 13:28:26(actual tape time) the cop begins moving towards her.
A person in a red shirt is sitting behind the desk, and a man in a dark suit is walking into the room.
An cut occurs, and now the red shirted person is standing in the doorway...unless red shirt teleported, there is something edited out. Wonder why?
And the timestamps are conveniently blurred even though no one’s face is around the area of the timestamps.
It doesn’t take long to take a couple of steps away from the desk...so why was it cut? Certainly not to save time.
To fit the agenda...that is why.
At 13 seconds, he lunges after her.
I don’t give a crap about any “cut” after that.
At 13 seconds, he starts pounding her.
How does anybody know the video wasn’t edited by the news station as they seem to have made quite the little montage for their broadcast.
13 seconds....the beating begins with no physical contact initiated by her.
Any other point is moot.
I don’t care if she hired a black lawyer, don’t care if she’s got a black community organizer boyfriend or a half-black kid.
Nobody deserves to be beaten for smarting off.
Nobody.