Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: NonValueAdded

Yes, most people do not know that the police have no obligation to protect you. Once they understand that, it changes their view about owning weapons.


8 posted on 08/03/2013 7:04:08 AM PDT by marktwain (The MSM must die for the Republic to live. Long live the new media!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: marktwain

If they have no duty to protect, then, WHAT EXACTLY is their duty?

Revenue enhancement?


11 posted on 08/03/2013 7:05:59 AM PDT by djf (Rich widows: My Bitcoin address is... 1ETDmR4GDjwmc9rUEQnfB1gAnk6WLmd3n6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain
I guess that applies to lifeguards, too.
14 posted on 08/03/2013 7:10:15 AM PDT by NonValueAdded ("When there is no penalty for failure, failures proliferate." George F. Will)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain
THEY HAD PROTECTION, THEY COWARDED OUT

Effect of the Law New York's Good Samaritan law carves out specific circumstances when an individual shall not be held liable for ordinary negligence in attempting to render medical assistance. Instead, they will only be held liable in cases of gross negligence. Gross Negligence Simply put, negligence is a failure to exercise ordinary care. Gross negligence means a failure to use even slight care, or is conduct that is so careless as to show complete disregard for the rights and safety of others. When it Applies The law isn't found in one centralized part, but rather integrated into various provisions of the NY Public Health Law and the NY Education Law. Importantly, New York's Good Samaritan law is limited to medical treatment or assistance. The heart of the law is found in Pub. Health Law §3000-a, which provides in part: Any person who voluntarily and without expectation of monetary compensation renders first aid or emergency treatment at the scene of an accident or other emergency outside a hospital, doctor's office or any other place having proper and necessary medical equipment, to a person who is unconscious, ill, or injured, shall not be liable for damages for injuries alleged to have been sustained by such person or for damages for the death of such person alleged to have occurred by reason of an act or omission in the rendering of such emergency treatment unless it is established that such injuries were or such death was caused by gross negligence on the part of such person.

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/1564360

21 posted on 08/03/2013 7:15:18 AM PDT by knarf (I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson