RE: Maybe Savage-Weiner is still upset Zimmerman wasn’t found guilty as he decreed Zimmerman should be.
What were his reasons for believing Zimmerman was guilty again?
“What were his reasons for believing Zimmerman was guilty again?”
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3039912/posts
I think, in a nutshell, it was that Savage-Weiner believed the recording of Zimmerman saying, “f’ing punks” was really him saying, “f’ing coons”, and that Zimmerman’s firearm didn’t have a safety (which doesn’t exist on it) engaged, which, to Savage-Weiner, ‘proves’ he intended to gun down Martin.
One reason was because a safety wasn’t on, that is on a gun without a ‘safety.’
Meaning he was talking out his rear but wanted to sound oh so intelligent on the subject. Which he didn’t.
Basically he shouldn’t have had a round chambered, according to Savage. Many New York City people go all squishy talking about guns, they just can’t be rational.