[imardmd1]

From the above article:

"But Burnham was thrilled at what the fossilized bones told him about the life of the duckbill."

Here is another creationist, devising his fairy tale out of a fossilized bone with a tooth jammed in it, and pretends this is a dinosaur speaking to him through the formed rock.

This is real evolutionary science? Hmmm.

I'll take my Bible.

[mitch5501]

"Here is another creationist, devising his fairy tale..."

You sure that's what you meant to say?

[Vanders9]

I agree that they are drawing a lot of conclusions from very little evidence, which could quite easily be validly interpreted in other ways. So they found a tooth in a fossilised bone. So what? That doesnt mean the animal was still alive when it got bit. I chipped a tooth biting a ballpoint but that doesnt mean my bic was alive.