1 posted on
07/30/2013 2:27:27 PM PDT by
Olog-hai
To: Olog-hai

Judgement? Yim is on the left with her new partner.
2 posted on
07/30/2013 2:32:30 PM PDT by
struggle
To: Olog-hai
And they said it wouldn’t last.
They were right.
3 posted on
07/30/2013 2:32:30 PM PDT by
Catmom
(We're all gonna get the punishment only some of us deserve.)
To: Olog-hai
The journalist might as well claim that a toaster had divorced an elm tree: If they can’t be married, then they can’t be divorced.
4 posted on
07/30/2013 2:32:34 PM PDT by
Pollster1
("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
To: Olog-hai
Like this is such a surprise? the only reason these people wanted gay marriage in the first place was so that they could destroy the institution.
5 posted on
07/30/2013 2:34:58 PM PDT by
Jean2
To: Olog-hai
No such thing as homo marriage, you cannot change the definition of a word without destroying the validity of contracts.
Look what happened to the word regulated....
6 posted on
07/30/2013 2:45:25 PM PDT by
Las Vegas Ron
(Rats vs. GOPe = Same train, different speed.)
To: Olog-hai
The judge just couldn’t figure out how to screw the husband since there wasn’t one.
7 posted on
07/30/2013 3:02:06 PM PDT by
pepsi_junkie
(Who is John Galt?)
To: Olog-hai
2009-2013...I am surprised that they aren’t shorter than the Kardashian wedding. They have about the same morals.
8 posted on
07/30/2013 3:03:19 PM PDT by
napscoordinator
(Santorum-Bachmann 2016 for the future of the Country!)
To: Olog-hai
Well. well well.
Welcome to wonderful world of Divorce!
May the side with the best lawyer royally screw the other.
Great example of:
Be careful of what you ask for, you just may get it!
9 posted on
07/30/2013 3:33:54 PM PDT by
RedMonqey
("Gun-free zones" equal "Target-rich environment.")
To: Olog-hai
They were never married anyway
To: Olog-hai
And the Lawyers win again.
11 posted on
07/30/2013 3:38:03 PM PDT by
verga
(A nation divided by Zero!)
To: Olog-hai
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson