Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Las Vegas Ron

For some reason I don’t trust any wireless feed for video/audio to my TV.

I got the impression that “ChromeCast” serves more like a alternative to your cable box, but can be controlled with another device.

If so, and for $35, it seems like a really big deal.


5 posted on 07/28/2013 11:05:30 AM PDT by Zeneta (No eternal reward will forgive us now for wasting the dawn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Zeneta
For some reason I don’t trust any wireless feed for video/audio to my TV.

Just curious, why?

Everything that get fed to it comes from my laptop, my lap top is secure, what could be a problem?

I'd like to know if I'm missing something??

6 posted on 07/28/2013 11:13:05 AM PDT by Las Vegas Ron (Rats vs. GOPe = Same train, different speed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Zeneta

To do wireless, you probably have a router. The router is password protected.

I also run the Windows firewall.

That is the direction home peripherals are going.


12 posted on 07/28/2013 12:44:29 PM PDT by TomGuy (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Zeneta
I got the impression that “ChromeCast” serves more like a alternative to your cable box, but can be controlled with another device. If so, and for $35, it seems like a really big deal.

Before you buy, you might want to read this review at c/net.

http://reviews.cnet.com/digital-media-receivers/google-chromecast/4505-6739_7-35823617.html

It does less than you think.

17 posted on 07/28/2013 6:04:22 PM PDT by SunTzuWu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson