You mean....the USA actually intended to elect a Marxist as President? TWICE??
It is, as you say, "speculation" and really nothing but speculation.
Is it "speculation" that 0bama is a "Marxist"?
Is it our collective imagination that this government at the highest levels has been committing treason?
Is it "speculation" that the GOP has failed to stop this subversion, as well as the hemorrhaging of the US Constitution?
You are old enough to know about how elections work. If the president had run as a Marxist, he would never have been elected. He ran on "hope and change" and on his novelty.
Is it "speculation" that 0bama is a "Marxist"?
I don't think he is. I would describe him as post-Marxist. Traditional Marxism is based on government by "the working class" - which of course really means ruthless politicians claiming to be the voice of "the working class."
The President does not care about "workers" - he cares about using tax money to purchase votes from anyone, whether they are working or not. In fact, if they are not working, so much the better. They need that government check more.
Is it our collective imagination that this government at the highest levels has been committing treason?
What is the difference between treason and bad policy?
Is it "speculation" that the GOP has failed to stop this subversion, as well as the hemorrhaging of the US Constitution?
The GOP exists to collect votes as best it can. It is a political party, not a committee of vigilance.