You are old enough to know about how elections work. If the president had run as a Marxist, he would never have been elected. He ran on "hope and change" and on his novelty.
Is it "speculation" that 0bama is a "Marxist"?
I don't think he is. I would describe him as post-Marxist. Traditional Marxism is based on government by "the working class" - which of course really means ruthless politicians claiming to be the voice of "the working class."
The President does not care about "workers" - he cares about using tax money to purchase votes from anyone, whether they are working or not. In fact, if they are not working, so much the better. They need that government check more.
Is it our collective imagination that this government at the highest levels has been committing treason?
What is the difference between treason and bad policy?
Is it "speculation" that the GOP has failed to stop this subversion, as well as the hemorrhaging of the US Constitution?
The GOP exists to collect votes as best it can. It is a political party, not a committee of vigilance.
And how they don't or how they can be corrupted to give the result you want.
Wake up, somnambulist, you're sleep walking through the coup.
You are old enough to know about how elections work. If the president had run as a Marxist, he would never have been elected. He ran on "hope and change" and on his novelty.
I'm also old enough to see The Fix when I see it and a regime that has already rigged the machination of the DoJ and every other alphabet agency. This is the same Marxist who hopes to "govern" via Executive Order. Btw -- exactly HOW a Marxist was able to run for President without being vetted by the previous GOP administration defies logic.
I don't think he is. I would describe him as post-Marxist. Traditional Marxism is based on government by "the working class" - which of course really means ruthless politicians claiming to be the voice of "the working class."
I do admire your honesty. However it just might cloud your perception of reality. 0bama is as Marxist as Marxist can be. "Traditional Marxism" by its very definition requires a fascist dictatorship and tyranny, doesn't it?
The President does not care about "workers" - he cares about using tax money to purchase votes from anyone, whether they are working or not. In fact, if they are not working, so much the better. They need that government check more.
On these matters we would indeed agree.
What is the difference between treason and bad policy?
I would start by noting un-Constitutional policies, laws, and agendas that violate rights or restrict liberty in the name of "security" or "fairness." For instance, granting "Amnesty" is Treason.
The GOP exists to collect votes as best it can. It is a political party, not a committee of vigilance.
I agree partly with you in that you've understated the position and agenda of the GOP for the past 20 years. It's existence is ostensibly to represent and support their constituency and We The People, AND to uphold the US Constitution. As a Party, it has betrayed their oath and duty. It appears its only function has been to display occasional objections to legislative overreach by the Dems and as you stated, votes from which they maintain power.