Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Invasion of Sicily 1943: Victory as a Strategic Mistake?
Townhall.com ^ | July 10, 2013 | Austin Bay

Posted on 07/10/2013 12:48:20 PM PDT by Kaslin

Seventy years ago this week, U.S. and British Commonwealth troops began Operation Husky, the invasion of Sicily. Foreshadowing D-Day 1944, Gen. Dwight Eisenhower served as overall Allied commander. Like D-Day, Allied airborne soldiers led the Husky assault by parachuting (on the night of July 9, 1943) into olive groves and rock-strewn fields along the island's southeastern shores.

On July 10, seven divisions -- three U.S., three British and the 1st Canadian Infantry Division -- launched an amphibious attack on a 100-mile long front. Despite several successful Axis air attacks on ships and a brazen Italian tank attack on U.S. positions near Gela, by midnight July 10 all seven divisions were ashore.

Putting seven divisions ashore so swiftly was an extraordinary coup. Oh, grievous errors occurred as the buildup proceeded, the most notorious being the July 11 downing of 23 U.S. transports by Allied anti-aircraft fire. The planes were ferrying paratroop reinforcements. Yet in its initial phases Husky demonstrated that the Anglo-American team had learned a great deal since the Operation Torch landings in November 1942. Planning and coordination had improved. North African combat had honed the skills of American forces.

Then came the hard slog, over Sicily's godforsaken rocks.

For the next six weeks, the Germans and a diminishing number of Italians fought brutal delaying actions. German infantry stalled the Commonwealth's east coast advances, south of the city of Messina. The Axis frustrated an American thrust in central Sicily.

The conflicting egos of the two Allied army commanders, Britain's Bernard Montgomery and America's George Patton, sorely tested Allied cooperation. Cool-headed Ike and his combined staff finessed both powerful personalities. The stubborn Montgomery continued to slam his troops against Axis positions near Mount Etna. His was the shortest route to Messina, and Messina, Sicily's route to Italy, was the prize. Messina sits on the western side of the Strait of Messina, known in classical times as Scylla and Charybdis. Capture Messina, and Sicily became an Axis POW cage.

The Germans wanted a bloody slugfest. Patton didn't. He sent mobile units toward the weakly defended northwest sector. On July 22 his troops seized the port of Palermo, as the U.S. 45th Infantry Division cut the long highway connecting Palermo and Messina. The U.S. bagged 20,000 prisoners.

Now U.S. troops pushed east toward Messina. The British kept pounding from the south. The hard slog did not end until Aug. 17. The Allies suffered 25,000 casualties (killed and wounded). The Germans lost 4,700 dead, 14,000 wounded and 5,500 captured. Italians suffered 4,300 dead, 32,000 wounded and 100,000 captured (possibly more).

The Sicily campaign placed Allied troops less than 10 miles (the strait's width) from mainland Italy.

The oh-so-close proximity of large Allied forces to Italy was enticing. And that enticement leads to the biggest historical question tagging Operation Husky: Was taking Sicily the best strategic choice, since it made an invasion of Italy inevitable? From south of Naples to the Po Valley, Italy's rugged and rocky terrain is a defender's delight and attacker's sorrow.

Winston Churchill had sold Sicily as the next logical step. Sicily was the classical route to Rome from North Africa, and knocking fascist Italy out of the war would deal Adolf Hitler's Axis a heavy political loss.

Sicily geographically dominates the central Mediterranean. Husky's advocates noted that for three millennia the island served as the stepping stone of to-and-fro commerce and war between North Africa and Europe.

American military leaders were not convinced. The decisive route to Berlin goes through France -- make the all-out effort there. Churchill also claimed Europe had a "soft underbelly." Italian and Balkan terrain is not soft. Several senior U.S. planners thought Churchill was really trying to defend British imperial interests.

Axis-controlled Sicily had served as a big aircraft carrier for attacking Allied shipping. Under Allied control, those bases would extend air cover to northern Italy and Sardinia. U.S. planners agreed that Husky made operational sense if the goal was securing air bases. But can we stop there, at the strait? Sicily's hard slog was costly. A strategic thrust up Italy's mountainous spine will be as just slow and deadly.

And indeed it was.


TOPICS: History; Military/Veterans
KEYWORDS: douglasmacarthur; foreignaffairs; macarthur; operationhusky; sicily; war; worldwarii
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 last
To: nickcarraway

MacArthur of course did coordinate, as would be necessary to borrow little things like aircraft carriers, amphibious landing craft (we were always short of them) fuel and ammunition.

It made sense to push the Japanese in the south (SW Pac) as well as the Central Pacific, as they couldn’t (after midway)_ maneuver their forces as well as we could.

Professional military types back then thought in terms of the Lanchester Equations.

Enemy loss rate is proportional to the quality of your force, and the square of your numbers. Your loss rate is proportional to the enemy quality and the square of the enemy numbers.

That helps understand why we tried to use superior mobility in the pacific and in Europe to create strong concentrations against enemy locations with relative weakness.

That led to Spruance and Halsey each planning alternate attacks, with the carrier fleet changing numbers as it moved to support whichever attack was planned.


81 posted on 07/11/2013 8:08:47 PM PDT by donmeaker (Blunderbuss: A short weapon, ... now superceded in civilized countries by more advanced weaponry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Tallguy
Guadalcanal & Tarawa were Navy/Marine Corps operations, not under the command of MacArthur. I’m sure he noticed those mistakes, but they weren’t his.

While the Guadalcanal campaign saw the vast majority of the heavy lifting done by the Marines, Army troops took part in the battles for Henderson Field, Point Cruz, Koli Point and other locations. Calling the operation completely a Navy/Marine operation isn't entirely accurate. That isn't to understate the valor and sacrifice of the Marines, of course.

82 posted on 07/11/2013 8:13:10 PM PDT by Colonel_Flagg (Army dad. And damned proud.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: donmeaker
For a well-argued presentation of the case against invading Iwo Jima, read Worth the Cost? Justificaton of the Iwo Jima Invasion on the Historynet site. Included are responses by those taking issue with the author.
83 posted on 07/11/2013 8:46:41 PM PDT by Fiji Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: donmeaker
By the way, a lot of Americans probably don't know that the Meat Ball flies over Iwo Jima--now called Iwo Tō, its original name, but which means the same thing--Sulfur Island.
84 posted on 07/11/2013 8:55:32 PM PDT by Fiji Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Colonel_Flagg

“While the Guadalcanal campaign saw the vast majority of the heavy lifting done by the Marines, Army troops took part in the battles for Henderson Field, Point Cruz, Koli Point and other locations. Calling the operation completely a Navy/Marine operation isn’t entirely accurate.”

Thanks for pointing that out.

I would simply add that while the Guadalcanal/Solomons campaign was going on, there was a separate CINC for the SW Pacific Theater — Admiral William F. Halsey.

Nimitz had the Central Pacific; MacArthur the South Pacific. Theoretically they were co-equal, but I’m sure that Halsey reported to Nimitz and also had to reconcile his actions with MacArthur’s forces fighting on New Guinea.


85 posted on 07/12/2013 10:11:06 AM PDT by Tallguy (Hunkered down in Pennsylvania)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Fiji Hill

Okinawa is also now part of Japan.


86 posted on 07/12/2013 11:02:36 AM PDT by donmeaker (Blunderbuss: A short weapon, ... now superceded in civilized countries by more advanced weaponry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Colonel_Flagg

Keep in mind that the Marines were a very small part of the Navy in WWII.

Of 248 amphibious landings, 48 were conducted by Marines, 200 by Army. Of the 48 conducted by Marines, 48 had combat photographers along. Of the 200 conducted by the army, 2 had combat photographers along.

The photographic record is misleading at least.

The Marines lost more men in Vietnam than in WWII.

The outstanding contribution of the Marines in WWII was their amphibious landing doctrine.


87 posted on 07/12/2013 11:09:24 AM PDT by donmeaker (Blunderbuss: A short weapon, ... now superceded in civilized countries by more advanced weaponry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Fiji Hill

You missed this one..

http://music.cbc.ca/#/blogs/2012/6/The-D-Day-Dodgers-fight-back-in-song

D-Day Dodgers - A Canadian version:

Some versions have more colourful language.

(sung to the tune of Lili Marlene)

We’re the D-Day Dodgers out in Italy -
Always on the vino, always on the spree.
Eighth Army scroungers and their tanks
We live in Rome - among the Yanks.
We are the D-Day Dodgers, over here in Italy.

We landed at Pachino, a holiday with pay
Jerry brought a band out, to cheer us on our way
Showed us the sights, and gave us tea
We all sang songs, the beer was free
We kissed all the girls in Napoli.
For we are the D-Day Dodgers, over here in Italy.

The Moro and Ortona were taken in our stride
We didn’t have to fight there. We just went for the ride.
Anzio and Sangro were all forlorn.
We did not do a thing from dusk to dawn.
For we are the D-Day Dodgers, over here in Italy.

On our way to Florence we had a lovely time.
We ran a bus to Rimini right through the Gothic Line.
On to Bologna we did go.
Then we went bathing in the Po.
For we are the D-Day Dodgers, over here in Italy.

Once we had a blue light that we were going home
Back to dear old Canada, never more to roam.
Then somebody said in France you’ll fight.
We said never mind, we’ll just sit tight,
The windy D-Day Dodgers, out in Sunny Italy.

Now Lady Astor, get a load of this.
Don’t stand up on a platform and talk a load of piss.
You’re the nation’s sweetheart, the nation’s pride
But we think your bloody big mouth is far too wide.
For we are the D-Day Dodgers, out in Sunny Italy.

When you look ‘round the mountains, through the mud and rain
You’ll find the scattered crosses, some which bear no name.
Heartbreak, and toil and suffering gone
The boys beneath them slumber on
They were the D-Day Dodgers, who’ll stay in Italy.

So listen all you people, over land and foam
Even though we’ve parted, our hearts are close to home.
When we return we hope you’ll say
“You did your little bit, though far away
All of the D-Day Dodgers, way out there in Italy.”


88 posted on 07/12/2013 11:12:52 AM PDT by Snowyman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Tallguy

Thanks for your thoughts. The idea of split command, while not completely optimal, did tone down the inter-service rivalries of the day.

And it also worked, so it’s really hard to knock.


89 posted on 07/12/2013 1:14:06 PM PDT by Colonel_Flagg (Army dad. And damned proud.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: donmeaker
Of 248 amphibious landings, 48 were conducted by Marines, 200 by Army. Of the 48 conducted by Marines, 48 had combat photographers along. Of the 200 conducted by the army, 2 had combat photographers along.

I've studied World War II for 35 years and this fact had escaped me. Thanks for clueing me in!

90 posted on 07/12/2013 1:16:42 PM PDT by Colonel_Flagg (Army dad. And damned proud.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Snowyman
You missed this one...D-Day Dodgers

That's a tune I was unfamiliar with. The singers give that commie Lady Astor a well-deserved skewering.

91 posted on 07/12/2013 8:10:30 PM PDT by Fiji Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: donmeaker
Of the 48 conducted by Marines, 48 had combat photographers along. Of the 200 conducted by the army, 2 had combat photographers along.

Fury in the Pacific (1945) is a short documentary on the invasion of Pelelu and Anguar by the Marines and Army. The US casualties included nine of the photographers.

92 posted on 07/12/2013 8:40:51 PM PDT by Fiji Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: wbill

I agree.


93 posted on 07/15/2013 12:37:35 PM PDT by jmacusa (Political correctness is cultural Marxism. I'm not a Marxist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson