Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

California sex offender given custody of daughter now arrested
KFOR ^ | Paige Hill

Posted on 07/10/2013 12:26:52 PM PDT by Morgana

NORMAN, Okla.– After being given sole custody of a six-year-old girl, a convicted sex offender was placed under arrest and the child was taken away.

A few weeks ago, an Oklahoma County judge made a decision that shocked many Oklahomans after he awarded sole custody of a child to her father, Nicholas Elizondo, who was also a convicted sex offender.

Authorities say the little girl, Sarah, is now in the custody of DHS after Elizondo was arrested this past weekend in California.

Elizondo was pulled over for speeding on Sunday but Bakersfield police officers soon found a bullet in his car.

(Excerpt) Read more at kfor.com ...


TOPICS: Conspiracy
KEYWORDS: california; convicted; convictedoffender; dhs; elizondo; nicholaselizondo; oklahoma
One bullet just happened to be found in his car. Yep. Just after people began to rally for them. Whoever put the bullet there THANK YOU.
1 posted on 07/10/2013 12:26:52 PM PDT by Morgana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Morgana

That judge needs to be removed from the bench. He’s a psychopath.


2 posted on 07/10/2013 12:42:21 PM PDT by headstamp 2 (What would Scooby do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Is the judge still a judge?


3 posted on 07/10/2013 12:43:21 PM PDT by WayneS (Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

The United States of America, where you can be arrested and have your child taken from you because you have a bullet.

If you want to argue that the man should not have the child, that is a great argument to have.

But once we stop cheering for the ends justifying the means, maybe we could get back to being upset about our basic liberties being destroyed by an all-powerful state.

Because if they can arrest this guy and take his kid away for a bullet, they could arrest YOU and take YOUR kids away if you had a bullet.

So imagine if you managed somehow to drop a bullet into your car, and then you are driving in California. Say goodbye to your kids?


4 posted on 07/10/2013 12:44:18 PM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: headstamp 2

You’d have to become familiar with the entire context of the story to even begin to understand why the judge might have ruled this way.

The man was convicted of a lesser charge without a trial — a plea bargain that many people might well take if innocent because the cost of losing at trial is so great. It is clear that the judge in this case determined that the prior conviction was not indicative of reality. He could well have been wrong, but he didn’t ignore it.

And the mother of this child was shut out for another reason. There was a charge made that this man had abused another child. Evidence was then presented which suggested that charge was made up by the mother in order to win the custody battle. Again, we have no way of knowing who is lying.

BUT, I think we could understand why, if a mother lies about sex abuse in order to win custody of a child, that a judge might decide to punish the mother by granting custody to the falsely accused party. I think a child should not be punished by removal from the mother, but I understand why others might not think that.

Sometimes, when something looks entirely outrageous, it is because we don’t have all the facts presented to us. Or it could be the judge was crazy.


5 posted on 07/10/2013 12:49:45 PM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

“Elizondo says he completed parole and probation in 2001 and that he only pleaded no contest to one of 11 charges to have the other 10 dismissed back in 1995.

“He believes police incited the child to say incriminating things to build a case against him.”

Importantly, the mother cut off visitation with the father because she says that, “After one visit, Knight alleges, Sarah came home saying that her half brother, 19, touched her private parts.”

So this means she has not only accused her ex-husband, but his son of molestation as well.


6 posted on 07/10/2013 1:06:11 PM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy (Best WoT news at rantburg.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT
You are obviously a pedophile!

</sarcasm>

7 posted on 07/10/2013 1:22:46 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Who could have guessed that one day pro wrestling would be less fake than mainstream journalism?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

So... why was the daughter arrested?


8 posted on 07/10/2013 1:30:55 PM PDT by Jack Hammer (American)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson