Posted on 07/05/2013 7:50:19 PM PDT by The Wizard
Getting galded is no fun.
no pics of being galded hopefully
Well, in the original Oz books, the character of the Wizard before the arrival of Dorothy was quite ambiguous.
I’ve watched the movie three times.
It’s a beautiful, entertaining piece of filmmaking.
The lead character is supposed to be questionable as a hero. That’s the story. He’s not presented as heroic and admits that of himself.
But at the end he decides to devote himself to one woman, who is not an evil witch but a good one.
And he saves an entire people by his ingenuity and tenacity. And he allows the good witch to influence him to do this good thing, whereas in the movie’s beginning she (her other self back in Kansas) was unable to do so although she tried.
As for the evil witches, you have to credit that they deserved everything they got because they weren’t simply flawed characters as he was, but truly evil.
Now one of the sister witches wasn’t nearly as evil as the other, but neither was she as good as the first glimpse of her character seemed to project. As the story progressed her inherent weaknesses and susceptibilities to self-deception and impulsive, self-pitying actions drove her to become the most evil of all.
I can honestly say I have no interest in being 4-oxalomesaconate tautomerase (enzyme commissioner # GalD).
wow. You have talent (on loan from Gald?)
We purchased it and watched it three times at home. My daughter saw it in the theaters in 3-D and said it was even more amazing. It is family friendly for all ages
You both make this movie sound very interesting and entertaining. I’m not a big Wizard of Oz fan, but I’ll check it out.
There were parts of the movie that I liked, but in the whole, I was very disappointed. I thought the Wizard was sleazy!
What I didn't like about Franco's Oz was that in the original movie, Professor Marvel/Wizard (Frank Morgan) was a fast-talking flim-flam man whose dialog as full of quips and witty banter not unlike Robert Downey Jr.'s Tony Stark and/or Sherlock Holmes.
The dialog of Franco's Oz was dull and plodding in comparison.
...both of whom he seduced and abandoned...
It's true that he seduced Theodora, (Mila Kunis) but he did not seduce Evanora. (Rachel Weisz)
Evanora lied and only led Theodora to believe this so that her heart would be turned against Oz and to evil.
See: Evanora the Wicked Witch of the East
All this being said, I still liked the movie overall and how it tied into the original.
i loved the first one
i loved the second one
Wow. You must have seen a diffrent movie the we did. Both my wife and I thought the movie SUCKED big time. Nothing about it was good.
There weren’t two different movies.
Just very different people watching and commenting.
I loved the fantasy aspects and the special effects. I usually like Franco, but in this, I thought he was very weak. I enjoyed it, but it’s not on my top ten of great movies. Stacked up against the original, it falls short.
Agree with your comments, exception to the last one that compares/contrasts it with the orignal movie. For me, it is so different and distinct from the original, my mind won’t even try to go there. I consider them entirely seperate and judge them accordingly.
orignal = original
Believable? Unless the fairy-tale versions make more sense to one.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.