Posted on 06/21/2013 3:03:29 PM PDT by dennisw
So, after all the hype and rumours of disaster, what’s World War Z like? Well, even though it’s directed by Marc Forster, it reminded me of the action films made by Roland Emmerich, which range from the nearly sublime (Independence Day) to the totally ridiculous (10,000 BC).
It’s slap-bang in the middle of that quality spectrum, round about the level of Godzilla.
Movies don’t come bigger than this, and zombie flicks usually come a lot smaller. In Shaun Of The Dead, the undead had to content themselves with snacking on a handful of British actors in a deserted pub. Here it’s the future of humanity that’s at stake. This time, instead of Simon Pegg, Brad Pitt is available to save us, and the skies are soon full of crashing helicopters, screaming jets and stunt people being sucked out of aircraft.
The film is impressive in its big set pieces. The initial panic on the streets of Philadelphia is thrilling, as is the fall of Jerusalem to the undead horde and an airborne sequence that might easily have been called Zombies On A Plane.
But the film is horrifyingly feeble when it comes to characterisation. All we know about Pitt’s Gerry is that he loves his family, but no one has given this hero any exceptional qualities. The same goes for the other characters: as uninteresting a lot as I’ve seen in a disaster movie.
We never know why the powers-that-be at the United Nations think so highly of Gerry. He’s resourceful, but doesn’t seem particularly brave, bright or knowledgeable. It is a central weakness that, without any particular expertise, he solves the mystery of how to fight the zombies before anyone else.
Negative reaction: The last 40 minutes of the film where rewritten and reshot
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
I did miss that. He didn’t act like one, he acted like he loved his country. Oh well, I still really enjoyed it a lot.
I’m a fan of The Walking Dead. Pretty sure WW Z won’t come close. But I’m still interested.
*******************************************************************
I just got back from seeing WW Z. The critics were not too far off the mark. The film was more funny than scary—I’m not sure I remember a time in an “intended to be serious” movie where zombies elicited laughter from the audience rather than fright. And that laughter came out a number of times. Also, a couple of the zombies were more annoying than either funny or scary. Oh well, at least I got to spend some time with my son at the show.
I think the extras playing the zombies in WW Z would have done well to have taken Zombie Acting 101 from the Zombie extras in The Walking Dead—now that show has Zombies the way Zombies should be, frightening.
Apocalypto gets better every time I see it, every character in it is fascinating, even a little kid or a seemingly/usually nondescript old woman is fascinating to watch.
The audience got a pretty good idea of what it was like to be hunted for food by Aztecs or Mayans. It's not for the squeamish, but the pacing is like the original Indiana Jones, only with no let up or English dialogue.
For a movie with no English dialogue, it's remarkably accessible.
It wasn't. It was from White House Down.
Whenever a movie is made, there's always an 'A' version, 'B' version, etc.
The 'x' version will be called White House on the Down Low.
Where to start? :/
My wife just read the book and said that while it was well-written, the story itself was hokey. May read it myself to see what she’s talking about.
In other words the WW Z zombies did not come off as genuine zombies like you have seen in walking dead and other well executed zombie movies. With such a huge budget they Z should have at least gotten that part right
This movie is mindless entertainment, but that is why I went. I wanted to to see zombies, fires, explosions, and more zombies on fire and exploding.
That is what I paid for and that is what I got.
anyone that goes expecting more is going to be disappointed, or doesn't understand the purpose of zombie movies.
agreed....lost me there too but that doesn’t mean the reviewer is wrong about this movie
I will not be seeing "White house down" with the racist Jamie Foxx in it. I don't care what kind of reviews it gets.
You are aware that Jamie Foxx is the racist that said the best part of Django was "shooting all the white people."
I won't spend one cent supporting his racist butt.
A zombie ping list? I have got to be on this. I need to know when the DNC voter drives happen...cheers!
I would like to see Zombies vs. Vampires. :-)
You’re on. Thanks.
You oughta check out the WWZ audiobook. VERY fine piece of work. Loads of famous actors doing the voices of the characters: Mark Hamill, Rob and Carl Reiner, Alan Alda.....
i'm starting to feel sorry for the poor bastards since Zombies are the only group you can slaughter, burn, crush, kill, destroy with impunity and not be called a bigoted, sexist, racist, homoloath because they have bad PR unlike our real enemies the RATS and the goathumpers...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.