Well gosh.
I have to disagree with people on this thread, absolutely insane backward ruling that far over steps proper government power.
Power of which government?
Its a completely impractical idea. it cant possibly work.
It does show that you can have extreme activist judges on opposite side of sexual/reproductive libertarianism (ie so-libs) that can create havoc.
Granted I probably fall in with at least the gov’t’s intention on this one, but it seems to me any gov’t who has this power could potentially say anyone who has sex are then divorced if they were already married, you just need the right nutso judge.
For sure you wouldn’t be married in the eyes of many faiths, no matter what the state claims.
Freegards