The evidence is the four year old child.
If one is properly observing *all* the rules of the road, one will *not* hit pedestrians crossing the street. Period.
I don’t know if this girl is better off without her father, but I know FR would be better off without you. You are not to be trusted.
Yeah, tell that to the guy who hit and killed a little kid who ran out from behind a hedgerow in my hometown.
He was not speeding, he was not impared, and he still hit and killed the kid.
No charges were filed.
Again offer proof he was speeding, or shut up.
You are the reason I hate the internet.
Read the articles, it was an accident. Period.
He was being punched and kicked.
Feared for his life and defended it.
Many kids and animals are hit every day by people observing every law of the road to the letter. Its called an accident.
Sure as hell i’d be mad if a cop hit my kid, but my reaction would be to attend to my child.
Don't bother answering any of the questions I posted. Based on this comment alone that you posted, rationality is going to be wasted.
You obviously don't live in Baltimore. Hehe
In Bawl-tee-more, it's pretty much understood that the pedestrian has the right of way to cross the street, any street no matter how busy, wherever and whenever he/she pleases. It's pretty common to see two, three, even a whole group of 4-7 people crossing the street no where close to a traffic light or crosswalk.
And don't you dare shoot them a dirty look as you narrowly miss them with your car, whitey!