“Sorry, but scientifically speaking, there is no controversy, and there are not two sides to consider.”
This is exactly what they used to say about “global warming” before they saw it wasn’t working and switched the name to “climate change.”
Again, look at Walt Brown’s “In the Beginning.”
And they say the same about Newton's Laws, and Einstein's theories, and that doesn't make those untrue, does it, FRiend?
"Global Warming" is an almost unique case where a large scientific community was caught in the act of corrupting its own data to conform to a political agenda.
No evidence of similar scale corruption exists for other important scientific enterprises, most notably for evolution theory.
One reason is that research into evolution has been going on for now 150+ years, with scientific generation after generation exploring deeper and learning more about our past.
In all that time, evolution theory has stood every test proposed to falsify it.
Evolution is also confirmed by data from virtually every other branch of science, including now DNA analysis.