Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: EveningStar

Do evolutionists know the precise genes, in progressive sequence, corresponding with each gradual change between progressive species in the line of descent leading from lower primates to to humans?

Or between any progressive species in any line of descent?


4 posted on 06/06/2013 2:40:37 PM PDT by reasonisfaith ("...because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved." (2 Thessalonians))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: reasonisfaith

How about genetic proof of the species that occurred just before evolving into a modern human. Why step back to the beginning if one step back can’t be defined positively.

I have spent a lot of time web searching over the years and have not come up with this answer. It’s possible I am not searching correctly but I have found nothing that answers that question for me. There have been quite a few human-like species in the fossil record. I would like to know when did Species X turned into modern human and what is the evidence that one came from the other?


8 posted on 06/06/2013 3:03:38 PM PDT by Dutch Boy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: reasonisfaith

Submit the question to them, one of them will no doubt develop a Lie to say yes.

Several of their buddies will no doubt swear to it.

But the research will be classified as a stipulation of their government funding.


12 posted on 06/06/2013 4:43:58 PM PDT by DanielRedfoot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: reasonisfaith
reasonisfaith: "Do evolutionists know the precise genes, in progressive sequence, corresponding with each gradual change between progressive species in the line of descent leading from lower primates to to humans?"

One of the greatest scientific minds of all time, Isaac Newton, is quoted as saying (circa 1720):

In nearly 300 years since Newton, scientists have found many smoother pebbles and prettier shells, while at the same time "the great ocean of truth" has seemed to expand to now include the entire Universe, and possibly beyond...

So, compared to that ever-growing "great ocean of truth" we know even less today than Newton imagined he knew in 1720.

To answer your specific question, a scientific theory does not require perfect knowledge to either confirm or falsify.
It does require that its predictions are confirmed by observed data (aka facts), and this standard is met by the evolution hypothesis.
So it's a scientific theory.

20 posted on 06/07/2013 4:46:11 PM PDT by BroJoeK (a little historical perspective....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: reasonisfaith
Do evolutionists know the precise genes, in progressive sequence, corresponding with each gradual change between progressive species in the line of descent leading from lower primates to to humans?

Probably not, but they don't accept the Good just made it that way and this species is probably one that couldn't get to the Ark fast enough theories.

25 posted on 06/08/2013 6:53:48 AM PDT by Sawdring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson