Posted on 06/05/2013 6:47:07 AM PDT by Renfield
Would you wear an electronic tattoo if you couldn’t log on to the Internet without one? That may sound crazy to many of you, but the technology for such a system already exists. RFID tattoos have existed for quite some time, and they are already being used on animals. But now an entirely new generation of electronic tattoos are being developed that can monitor your vital signs, interact with your mobile phone and even communicate directly with your mind. These new electronic tattoos are thinner than a human hair, and they are going to fundamentally transform the way that we think about human identification. Right now, the Internet is being absolutely plagued by hackers and identity theft has become a multi-billion dollar enterprise. It is becoming increasingly difficult to determine if someone is actually who they say that they are. And as even more of our commerce gets conducted through the Internet, identity security is going to be absolutely critical. Without a doubt, there will continue to be a push for more secure forms of identification than we have today. But there is also a very dark side to this kind of technology. What if someday a tyrannical government decides to make a permanent electronic tattoo for identification purposes mandatory for all citizens? What if you are not able to buy, sell, get a job, have a bank account or log on to the Internet without “proper identification”? What if the price for receiving your tattoo is to swear absolute allegiance to that tyrannical government? The truth is that technology is always a double-edged sword. It always brings with it the promise of progress, but it also always has a dark side that could potentially be abused.
The latest generation of electronic tattoos is quite remarkable. They are called “Biostamps”, and they were originally developed for medical purposes. However, as a recent Daily Mail article detailed, Motorola believes that these Biostamps could potentially replace passwords and make the Internet a much more secure place…
MC10 originally designed the tattoos, called Biostamps, to help medical teams measure the health of their patients either remotely, or without the need for large expensive machinery.
Motorola claims that the circuits, which also contain antennae and built-in sensors, could be adapted to work with mobile phones and tablets.
The mobile devices could then be used to confirm the owner’s identity and log them in to accounts automatically.
This would prevent thieves and other people from being able to access a phone, or individual apps on the device, if it is stolen or lost.
These Biostamps are extremely, extremely thin. As I mentioned above, they are actually thinner than a human hair. The following description of Biostamps was taken from a Wired Magazine article…
The development takes wearable technology to the extreme, designed as a non-invasive diagnostic sensor that could be used to measure hydration, activity, and even infant temperature. It bonds to the skin, somewhat like a temporary tattoo, flexing and bending in sync with your skin the way you wish a Band-Aid would. How? Researchers at the University of Illinois, Dalian University of Technology in China, and the University of California at San Diego made it really, really small.
With a thickness of 0.8 micrometers at the widest — around one-thousandth the diameter of a human hair — the thin mesh of silicon actually nestles in to the grooves and creases in your skin, even the ones too small to see. Being small helps, but it’s also important that the silicon is laid out in a serpentine pattern and bonded to a soft rubber substrate, allowing the stiff material to flex, a little bit like an accordion.
But why would such technology be needed on the Internet?
After all, don’t our passwords work just fine?
Actually, we are rapidly getting to the point where passwords are a joke. Hackers are becoming so sophisticated that they can crack even very long passwords with ease…
A team of hackers, commissioned by technology website Ars Technica, recently managed to crack more than 14,800 supposedly random passwords – from a list of 16,449 – as part of a hacking experiment.
The success rate for each hacker ranged from 62 percent to 90 percent, and the hacker who cracked 90 percent of hashed passwords did so in less than an hour using a computer cluster.
The hackers also managed to crack 16-character passwords including ‘qeadzcwrsfxv1331′.
Were you alarmed when you read that?
I know that I was.
Obviously we need a better system.
But personally I never plan to wear an electronic tattoo. That crosses the line in a big way.
Unfortunately, this kind of technology is going to be heavily pushed in the years ahead. According to Wired magazine, even the U.S. military is devoting resources to developing electronic tattoo technology…
In its ongoing quest to measure every aspect of U.S. troops’ physiology, Pentagon researchers are looking to develop a durable, unobtrusive device that can track the body’s physical response to stress. Military scientists believe that using the device — preferably a tattoo — to track heart-rate, temperature or bio-electric response during various training situations will help them crack the code of combat fatigue.
Another significant trend is the development of electronic devices that we can control directly with our minds. In the past, such technology was the stuff of science fiction novels, but now even the New York Times is writing about it…
Soon, we might interact with our smartphones and computers simply by using our minds. In a couple of years, we could be turning on the lights at home just by thinking about it, or sending an e-mail from our smartphone without even pulling the device from our pocket. Farther into the future, your robot assistant will appear by your side with a glass of lemonade simply because it knows you are thirsty.
Researchers in Samsung’s Emerging Technology Lab are testing tablets that can be controlled by your brain, using a cap that resembles a ski hat studded with monitoring electrodes, the MIT Technology Review, the science and technology journal of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, reported this month.
The technology, often called a brain computer interface, was conceived to enable people with paralysis and other disabilities to interact with computers or control robotic arms, all by simply thinking about such actions. Before long, these technologies could well be in consumer electronics, too.
So what if you could combine the two trends discussed above?
What if an electronic tattoo would allow you to operate your tablet computer, send an email, fly a drone or even “speak” telepathically using only your mind?
Actually, researchers are already working on such technologies. The following comes from a recent article by Charles Q. Choi…
But brain implants are invasive technologies, probably of use only to people in medical need of them. Instead, electrical engineer Todd Coleman at the University of California at San Diego is devising noninvasive means of controlling machines via the mind, techniques virtually everyone might be able to use.
His team is developing wireless flexible electronics one can apply on the forehead just like temporary tattoos to read brain activity.
“We want something we can use in the coffee shop to have fun,” Coleman says.
The devices are less than 100 microns thick, the average diameter of a human hair. They consist of circuitry embedded in a layer or rubbery polyester that allow them to stretch, bend and wrinkle. They are barely visible when placed on skin, making them easy to conceal from others.
The devices can detect electrical signals linked with brain waves, and incorporate solar cells for power and antennas that allow them to communicate wirelessly or receive energy. Other elements can be added as well, like thermal sensors to monitor skin temperature and light detectors to analyze blood oxygen levels.
You can read that rest of that article right here. Some of the things that our scientists are working on right now are absolutely mind blowing.
We live at a time when technology is advancing at an exponential rate. Sometimes I have a very hard time believing some of the technological advances that I am writing about. The world is going to look very, very different ten years from now.
But will the changes be for the better?
Technology is advancing at a faster pace than we have ever seen before, but at the same time the world is becoming an increasingly unstable place.
Could technology that enables us to interact with our environment using our minds actually be turned around and used to control our minds by a future tyrannical government?
Could technology that helps us identify one another on the Internet someday be used to brand us all like cattle and force all of humanity into a dark system of control and enslavement?
Don’t think that such a dystopian society can never exist in our modern world. Freedoms and liberties are being taken away from people all over the globe right now even though things are still relatively stable.
So what is going to happen when the world goes crazy someday and the planet is absolutely ravaged by economic collapse, pandemics, crime, rioting, natural disasters and war?
That is something to think about.
Biometrics does not work fine. No criminals ever spotted yet with camera biometrics in all of England the land of the big brother camera.
Electronic tattoos are a control mechanism, not a identity.
Would you take a electronic tattoo to gain the world for the rest of your life, to lose your soul for eternity?
I would rather starve. But I will not, because like all men God feeds me.
Cruise card—
Can it tell if you “fell” off the fantail?
Or got kidnapped in Acapulco?
I would like to see a hacker break my password, typing into my computer. OH, the test was done internaly to the computer you say, so that they could use a server cluster to crack the password?
Then how, pray tell will a skin chip keep them from doing that behind the entry device? Nothing changed but the entry method. The data behind the keyboard will be just a secure.
Foolish lies, to scare the unwary into slavery.
Definitely the start of the mark of the beast. The scary thing is that Americans have been softened up to tattoos in general. People have no regard for their bodies these days. So the inhibition we used to have towards these things is pretty much gone. Take a walk down the beach on a busy weekend and try to find people without tattoos. Hard to do. Most people won’t think twice about this stuff in 10 years. I hate to say it. 10 years ago it would have been impossible. Each day that goes by I just shake my head about what is now normal.
Password security is quite weak.
I don’t biometrics to spot criminals, but in place of passwords to allow account access - you place your finger on a reader for example, and the reader recognizes you. The tech exists and isn’t expensive.
I suspect some of them can, but maybe with a limited radius from the ship.
uh, nope. This is total control, even of the mind. Being dead would be better.
Mark of the devil.
When a mugger steals your bank card you call the bank and are mailed a new one. When a mugger cuts off your finger, or worse cuts out your eyeball, you can't order a replacement.
The hackers also managed to crack 16-character passwords including ‘qeadzcwrsfxv1331′.
Drat. Now I have to create a new password!
The biggest problem with passwords are that people are stupid, and don't know how to make good ones. The 2nd biggest IMO is the policies that surround passwords in most larger organizations. In corporations, they generally change too often, if they are changed at all for people to use genuinely strong password, or you are forced to enter it too many times to make use of a reasonably strong password practical. For instance, where I'm at, we have multiple password change cycles. I generally keep all my passwords the same, so I'm stuck with the shortest cycle of 60 days. Rather than using a truly strong password, like I use on my encryption keys, I have to limit myself to 10 characters or so because you have to enter the damn password so many times a day (corporate websites timeout on you after 15 minutes of inactivity), and I have to use rules to remember them that I wouldn't otherwise use, and they also have to be easy to type quickly. So, their own policies force me to use weaker passwords than I otherwise would. Typical stupidity you find in any large organization regardless if it is government or corporate.
Password security is not at all weak, as no hacker, no not one, trys to break keying in the password by actually keying in a password. Every guess takes too long.
Every single one of them boot in or backdoor and attack the software behind the users key in. If you key in with a chip, guess what, it does not improve security one tiny bit as that is NOT where the password is broken.
Password security being weak is the lie often repeated to sell biometric devices. Its crap just like biometrics.
There is not one safe cracker out there trying to guess the number combination, they all attack the mechanics. Know why? Because passwords work all too well.
You get an RFID chip and I can read it, and replay the code sequence to another reader. If your security is based on machine recognizing machine its easy to break. But put a human in the loop that has to actually press buttons and TIME will destroy your hopes for cracking or brute force methods.
You cannot program peoples fingers to work at warp speed.
Dehumanizing locks is the wrong direction for security, but the right direction for power and control.
So guess which way this train is going. Because passwords work well, but are not usefull for tracking information because they are private. While biometric chips can be used for a password subistute, they are a poor one. The however are designed to track, collect and disperse digital information. And that information can be used to spy on people or control their access to their accounts.
So we sell a subistitue that is crap, for a tool that works fine all for the purpose of power over the user.
It is evil to the core, a lie and a misdirection.
“Hey, sounds good to me!” - Marco D’Beast
There was a European society in the late 1930s-early 1940s that was "well organized"...We know how THAT turned out!
RFID stands for "Radio Frequency Identification" The idea is that when the RFID device gets in proximity to a reader, the information is read. That means than the information can be collected without the user's knowledge. They might be good for rapiid checkout at the grocery store, or inventory control in a warehouse, but they are horrible as an access control device or anything else involving security from my perspective.
In my job, I support many servers that use password protection. I can absolutely guarantee that the method used in this article would not work against any of my stuff. One thing their target machines did not do which is security 101 is lockouts after x numbers of failed attempts or a delay of a minute (or several minutes) after x number of failed attempts. These simple methods make brute force attacks far less successful and in the real world they are not very common as a result.
Much more common in this day and age is finding exploits in code that allow a user to gain privileged access. Most of the security bugs we encounter are items like this. These vulnerabilities are in no way addressed by RFID.
Thanks for the ping!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.