The fact that the father tried to go in the house. If his child's body was outside then there was no reason for his attempt.
If his child's body was not outside then it had been left to burn.
All the report says is that they were aware that the child had already perished.
And how did they know this without a body?
See my first sentence.
The JBT's story makes no sense.
“The fact that the father tried to go in the house. If his child’s body was outside then there was no reason for his attempt.”
There was no reason for the attempt after being told that your son was already dead.
“And how did they know this without a body?”
Presumably because they went in and found the body?