Obama uses Psy Ops every day, and it is a very tiring battle.
Does the sun rise in the east?
Demoralizing us is part of the plan.
Alinsky. Machiavelli. Sun Tzu. The Boy Kenyan has studied well.
Yes and just think how many simple minded Americans fall for it. Are we in trouble, look around and what do you see. Mindless simple uninformed jackasses.
The left has been at war with Americans since the Russian Revolution.
They began feeling thier oats when the Bolsheviks started blooding their hands and it’s been almost impossible to
live with them since then.
IMHO
Some psyops, but usually,
the Imposter just lies, and has agents lie and
forge documents, while keeping others secret in
2nd accounts.
I have thought so for a few years now. The proclamation for Gay month is a sure sign to me that he is mind “blanking” us.
Sorry, they lost me there. Maybe psychological warfare on stupid Americans?
Absolutely accurate assessment.
But his warfare against America is on all fronts to weaken America, the American economy, American defenses, American allies, Christianity, and Christian moral values.
PsyOps is one part of this.
Response: His attitude is Zimbabwean fertilized by the negro preacher Wright. He is being led by those who belong to another civilization and who are actively promoting an anti-Western war. The media is largely owned by others and actively promotes the attack on the West. In conclusion, it is not merely psychological warfare but active destruction of Western Civilization aided by a degenerate populace.
Absolutely. He is trying to terrify anyone who disagrees with him from dairy farmers to the small town preacher.
Ah, this is the change he was talking about, most of us knew it those that were ignorant willing tools and fools are the only ones that are being surprised about these “Revelations”...
I posted this on a WSJ article about US workers becoming risk averse, but it seems to explain Obama’s efforts to demoralize the voters, as well:
Geneticists say that risk taking is in the genes. The people who founded this country, the original pioneers were all risk takers, willing to brave the unknown for the opportunity to live their lives unshackled from an oppressive government.
The Progressive Democrats want to put limits on that freedom to succeed, calling it social justice. They say that we have too much, too much wealth and too much freedom, that we must tighten our belts and become more like Europe, the place that most of those early settlers risked their lives to leave. To accomplish this goal, the Progressives want to flood our shores with new immigrants, who lack the risk taking gene and simply want an easier life and a piece of the American pie.
He is an islamist, and we are to be completely subjugated by the so-called end of his second term.
Uh.......NO! There is nothing “psychological” about using Federal Agencies to illegally suppress the turn-out of the EXACT opposition who had just handed you your a$$ in the midterm elections. That is criminal Election Fraud on an industrial scale and it is an open declaration of war on the citizen.
The only “psychological” aspect of this war is the REFUSAL to enforce the law by the cowards sworn to do so!
Interesting, I said this very same thing last night. We are being pounded in a psyop designed to beat us down. We keep trying to fight a fair fight and “win” the arguments that are not intended to be defensible at all... the arguments just are and we continue to battle them with logic, process and rule-of-law. The battle is not winnable in this way.
There is only one way to win this battle and that is for one of the combatants to be eliminated.
نور اگر رفت سايه پيدا نيست نقش ديوار و چشم خيره ما نقش سايهدگر نمي دان نور اگر رفت سايه. ر رفت نور اگر رفت سايه پيدا نيست نقش ديوار و چشم خيره ما نقش سايهدگر نمي دان نور اگر رفت سايه. ررفت ديوار و چشم خيره ما نقش سايه دگر نمي دان نور اگر رفت سايه پيدانيست نقش ديوار و چشمخيره ماسايه ديوار و چشم خيره ما نقش سايه دگر نمي دان نور اگر رفت سايه پيدانيست نقش ديوار و چشم خيرهماپيدا نيست نقش
If I Hear Anything Else, I'll Let You Know.
The answers are the same.
No seeds planted here.
The ongoing PSYOP is trying to convince people that they are in the minority.
The Bolsheviks used it (Bolshevik meaning "majority").
Muzzling opposition through "political correctness", sensitivity training, and "hate crimes/speech" keeps people from saying what they think, and the silence is what makes people question whether they are alone in their beliefs.
It is the old "everyone believes" "the science is settled" approach to social mores and behaviours which the TOTUS and his cadre are unleashing on the populace via the MSM echo-chamber (how do they coordinate all those headlines, all the buzzwords?).
Some will be fooled, but more and more people I talk with need no encouragement to speak their mind--and they are seldom liberals in any sense of the word.
"The man who only flatters and cringes to gain applause, is a saint, compared with the man who tramples on law and constitution to secure the popularity his arts have obtained, and to retain the confidence of a party. There is something extremely contemptible in the factitious character of a popularity-seeker, or mere man of the people.--------- "The natural consequence of too much popularity is, that it enables the possessor to violate the laws and constitution of his country, and sacrifice its interests with impunity . . . During the war in Europe, in the beginning of the last century, the Duke of Marlborough, by an unusual tide of victory, was borne so high in popularity, that he had influence enough to prolong that war, for the purpose of enriching himself; and a commission was actually prepared, which would have made him general for life, but it was rendered ineffectual by, a single member of the ministry, who had firmness enough to refuse his seal. *
To be a tyrant with any tolerable degree of safety, a man must be fully possessed of the confidence of the people. Charles the first of England extended the royal prerogative to an unwarrantable length, and lost his head . . . but that prince could not have sent a detachment of three hundred men to drive the commons of England from their hall, and have effected his purpose. That act of despotism was reserved for the republican Cromwell, the friend of the people. James the second was an arbitrary man, a catholic, and odious to the English nation . . . he was, therefore, compelled to abdicate his throne. But his successor, William, a friend of the whigs, ascended the throne upon a tide of popularity; and he could deliberately sign an illegal and barbarous warrant for the murder of the whole village of Glencoe, in Scotland, and never be called in question for the murderous deed!** "Oh, 'tis excellent," says the poet,
"To have a giant's strength; but it is tyrannous
To use it like a giant."
MEASURE FOR MEASURE.
"The open advocate of a strong government is subject to popular odium, his encroachments are eyed with jealousy, or resisted by force. But the hypocritical pretender to patriotism acquires, in the confidence of the people, a giant's force, and he may use it like a giant. The people, like artless females, are liable to be seduced, not by the men they hate or suspect, but by those they love."Our natures do pursue,
Like rats that raven down their proper bane
A thirsty evil, and when we drink, we die."
MEASURE FOR MEASURE.
* Johnson's Life of Swift.
** Smollet. continuation of Hume. Anno. 1691.
"Nor is it among the least evils proceeding from the ambition of popular favor, that the friends of the people are willing to secure it, by relaxing the energy of the laws. They know that legal restraints are odious, and will hazard the public peace, rather than not gratify the licentious propensities of their partizans. But,
. . . . "But why this gloomy picture of errors committed, and evils felt or expected? Ought we to renounce our predilection for a republican government, and abandon, in despair, the experiment which our fathers have begun? By no means. Not only our duty enjoins, but necessity impels us to prosecute plans of national grandeur and happiness, which were contemplated by the revolution. To advance, indeed, requires courage and firmness; but to retreat is impossible, and would be infamy.
"To ourselves, however, and to posterity, it will be useful to inquire, with candor and impartiality, into the causes of our disappointments. The real truth is, our revolutionary schemes were too visionary . . . and our hopes too sanguine. A republican government, in which the supreme power is created by choice, is unquestionably the most excellent form of government in theory; and with all its imperfections, is, in fact, the most eligible form, for nations in the early stages of society. In old, corrupt, and very populous nations, it is probable that the state of society must always prevent the mass of citizens, from acquiring that portion of property, knowledge and independence of mind, which are absolutely essential to render an elective government a public blessing. Government takes its form very much from the character of the people to be governed; and a republican or free government, necessarily springs from the state of society, manners and property in the United States. No other form is proper for the country . . . no other will suit the present state of society . . . no other can be imposed upon Our citizens."