Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Paladin2
Since (gov’t funded) Hot Fusion didn’t work out so well over the last ~30 years, cold fusion is debunked?

Just this morning, I noticed that that giant hot fusion reactor in the sky is still going strong. Last night, I recall seeing thousands of hot fusion reactors speckling the sky. I expect I'll be seeing hot fusion reactors in the sky for the foreseeable future.

If "cold fusion" didn't violate so many laws of physics, and were a real phenomenon, we'd have seen it already in nature.

5 posted on 05/29/2013 5:32:08 PM PDT by exDemMom (Now that I've finally accepted that I'm living a bad hair life, I'm more at peace with the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: exDemMom

You would but pixie dust, which is not a naturally occurring element in nature, is absolutely necessary for cold fusion.


6 posted on 05/29/2013 7:17:34 PM PDT by RetiredTexasVet (Truth - the new hate speech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: exDemMom
"If "cold fusion" didn't violate so many laws of physics, and were a real phenomenon, we'd have seen it already in nature."

Actually, there is quite a bit of evidence that we "have" seen it in nature. The same people are denying THAT just as strongly as they are LENR, and with as little justification.....it doesn't match their theories.

Julian Schwinger stated what should be obvious.....the physics of the solid state is different from that of a high-energy plasma.

To put it another way, "quantum fusion" differs from "thermonuclear fusion" in just the same way that picking a lock differs from using a battering ram.

33 posted on 05/30/2013 8:15:22 AM PDT by Wonder Warthog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson