Ha!.....LOL....
Well you just have a great weekend, and don’t worry about little old me....I sure won’t worry about you.
But I must correct that last errant assumption you made about being anti-science....That does not describe me, not even a little bit. I love science...I enjoy reading about it and I had no intention of making a issue of my skepticism regarding this device until you lambasted me over a post to someone else in which I tried to say that electrical measurements of the type the testers made are rarely if ever faked because it would show up in any subsequent test. The only way to do it would be to use de-calibrated or de-tuned measuring devices on each test. Some very unlikely to occur so the fakery, if there was any, was not electrical, or shielded power wiring.
The only use of electricity that I can see in the test of this device, as I said, seems to be to create heat to start a reaction or to create ions for the reaction. The primary measurement to watch would then be related to any excess heat produced in the chamber above and beyond what the electricity used could possibly make.
The fakery, if it occurred, would have been inside the device.
So I was not agreeing with the other skeptic. I was trying to show him he was wrong about the electrical power consumption being intentionally misread and only that.
But now I have indeed questioned the device’s legitimacy and unless and until I find out what his secret sauce is, I would never argue in favor of that device....not for one single second..
Transmutation indeed!....LOL
If you want to get a REAL perspective of LENR as science, read the book by Charles Beaudette...."Excess Heat". It is a superb examination of the hard EXPERIMENTAL scientific evidence for the LENR effect. It is slightly out of date, as it only covers up until about 2005 or so, and much progress has been made since.
Rossi may turn out to be a fraud. LENR certainly is NOT.