Skip to comments.
Tornado Buster Missile.. Can a Tornado be Disrupted? [VANITY}
http://www.freerepublic.com ^
| May 20, 2013
| GeorgeWashingtonsGhost
Posted on 05/20/2013 2:45:28 PM PDT by GeorgeWashingtonsGhost
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61 next last
To: GeorgeWashingtonsGhost
I think this a bad idea. Atmospheric energy must be released; there would be unforeseen consequences.
21
posted on
05/20/2013 3:05:04 PM PDT
by
Ray76
(Do you reject Obama? And all his works? And all his empty promises?)
To: dhs12345
Projectiles that pin-wheel.. Hmmmm.. You’re onto something.
To: Ray76
To: GeorgeWashingtonsGhost
You have to disrupt the upper atmosphere, not the funnel. Otherwise it reforms. That is hundreds of miles of sky, thousands of feet ‘deep’.
To: GeorgeWashingtonsGhost
1) Hard to predict location more than 15 minutes ahead of time
2) The energy in the thunderstorm, and its physical size, are beyond comprehension. These things are 50,000 feet tall.
25
posted on
05/20/2013 3:11:55 PM PDT
by
lacrew
(Mr. Soetoro, we regret to inform you that your race card is over the credit limit.)
To: GeorgeWashingtonsGhost
If I remember Jules Verne wrote a si-fi novel in which they destroyed waterspouts with canon fire.
I don’t remember if it was THE MASTER OF THE WORLD or ROBUR THE CONQUEROR, or a different novel.
26
posted on
05/20/2013 3:12:11 PM PDT
by
Ruy Dias de Bivar
(When someone burns a cross on your lawn, the best firehose is an AK-47.)
To: GeorgeWashingtonsGhost
We cannot stop one little tornado with a nuclear bomb, but we can change the entire world’s climate by driving around too much in our cars.
27
posted on
05/20/2013 3:12:52 PM PDT
by
Bubba_Leroy
(The Obamanation Continues)
To: GeorgeWashingtonsGhost
28
posted on
05/20/2013 3:13:21 PM PDT
by
Brad from Tennessee
(A politician can't give you anything he hasn't first stolen from you.)
To: GeorgeWashingtonsGhost
And maybe something that doesn’t fly very efficiently, too but would have to survive the beating. And the energy would have to go somewhere. Converted to heat from friction and wind resistance?
A ton of energy though.
29
posted on
05/20/2013 3:14:55 PM PDT
by
dhs12345
To: GeorgeWashingtonsGhost
I’ve been around tornadoes.
Unless you’re willing to go nuclear, I’m sure there is not enough energy to disrupt one.
I’ll bet they have megatons of energy.
30
posted on
05/20/2013 3:17:32 PM PDT
by
Uncle Miltie
(WHO IS ON THE ENEMIES LIST?)
To: GeorgeWashingtonsGhost
Work was done at NASA Ames on the subject of disrupting twisters back in the 1970s.....takes a lot of energy to disrupt a single touch down when you have multiple outbreaks it doesn’t work. Plus the damage by effort to eliminate the tornado is most likely worse than the tornado it self
31
posted on
05/20/2013 3:19:00 PM PDT
by
Nifster
To: GeorgeWashingtonsGhost
I’m kind of on the lines of not trying to alter mother nature.
32
posted on
05/20/2013 3:19:36 PM PDT
by
Durbin
To: dhs12345
that’s why I ended my response with the requisite “/s”
33
posted on
05/20/2013 3:23:03 PM PDT
by
Vendome
(Don't take life so seriously, you won't live through it anyway)
To: Gen.Blather
34
posted on
05/20/2013 3:23:22 PM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
To: cripplecreek
If I lived there I would at least have a 20 ft shipping container buried,
35
posted on
05/20/2013 3:24:40 PM PDT
by
Lurkina.n.Learnin
(President Obma; The Slumlord of the Rentseekers)
To: GeorgeWashingtonsGhost
In the 1800s and before, sailing ships used to fire cannonballs at waterspouts in the hope of disrupting them before the got close enough to do damage. Waterspouts are generally much weaker and smaller than a full-on tornado though. And modern day analyses seem to conclude that such a tactic would not have worked in any event.
To: Vendome
37
posted on
05/20/2013 3:27:00 PM PDT
by
dhs12345
To: kaehurowing
In the 1800s and before, sailing ships used to fire cannonballs at waterspouts in the hope of disrupting them before the got close enough to do damage. Waterspouts are generally much weaker and smaller than a full-on tornado though. And modern day analyses seem to conclude that such a tactic would not have worked in any event.
But the sailors were bored and full of grog. Plus it was a lot more fun than the buggery.
38
posted on
05/20/2013 3:32:25 PM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
To: GeorgeWashingtonsGhost
You do not want to add energy to a tornado. The twister is just the part that you can see.
To: Gen.Blather; GeorgeWashingtonsGhost
If it can't be easily disrupted, how about finding a way to start it earlier - when the equalization needed would be less intense and/or when the zones pass over a less populated area.
.But if you really want to stop it in its tracks, then perhaps flying overhead and dropping a picture of Helen Thomas into the vortex would do the trick.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson