Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Benghazi Cover-up Video
Independent Journal Review ^ | 5/14/2013 | Kyle Becker

Posted on 05/14/2013 10:55:31 PM PDT by Beave Meister

Sometimes it is better to show a scandal than to explain it. SHARE this exposure of the Benghazi cover-up!

(Excerpt) Read more at ijreview.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: benghazi; chickenscomehome; chrisstevens; corruption; coup; coverup; democrats; democratscorruption; dirtbags; fraud; hillary; hillaryclinton; islam; jaycarney; liberallies; liberals; libya; lyingliars; military; muslims; obama; scandal; scumbags; susanrice; toroost; youtube
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last
To: Beave Meister

PFL


21 posted on 05/15/2013 12:27:24 AM PDT by Clump ( the tree of liberty is withering like a stricken fig tree)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Freedom of Speech Wins
Was the foreign policy debate that Romney messed up on, not going into the muck.

Yes.

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Peace/2013/05/10/Carney-blames-Romney-for-Benghazi

"There is the discussion about, you know, the Republicans again, and this ongoing effort that began hours after the attacks, when Mitt Romney put out a press release to try to take political advantage out of these deaths, or out of the attack in Benghazi, and, in a move that was maligned even by members of his own party," Carney said during a press briefing. "And from that day forward, there has been this effort to politicize it."

There was a crisis mentality right after the murder of Americans, NOT because of the attack, but, because Romney had the nerve to say something about it. That to me was very telling given the blatant lies coming from the administration claiming some video caused a spontaneous uprising. And the carnival barker is attempting to change the reality of what took place to Romney's comment right after the attack.

Romney had 'them' on the ropes but fumbled it when he got a second opportunity to expose the lies.

22 posted on 05/15/2013 12:43:12 AM PDT by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Beave Meister
When Obama says they weren't going to “jump the gun”, “jump to conclusions”, that the attack was terrorism.

Why then is it okay for him to “jump the gun”, “jump to conclusions”, that the attack was because of a video?

No one responds to this regime in the moment. How about at the daily press conference, someone say to a Jay Carney answer, “Jay, THAT'S A LIE”. “Jay, When is this regime going to start telling the American people the TRUTH?”

23 posted on 05/15/2013 5:18:35 AM PDT by faucetman ( Just the facts, ma'am, Just the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MestaMachine; annieokie; penelopesire; maggief; Protect the Bill of Rights; thouworm; SE Mom; ...

The most likely dot connected, as I see it, is what Admiral James Lyon is saying, an election “October- surprise” plot with a pre-planned kidnapping attempt of the Amb. Stevens in exchange for the Blind Sheik. They got hold in Stevens for several hours, but not alive, and then you have all the “stand down” orders, hello!!!


24 posted on 05/15/2013 6:44:52 AM PDT by danamco (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Irenic

Have been thinking about Benghazi ...something that occured to me is after the 2 brave guys(Woods & Dohtery) were killed, did the fighting just stop? Why? if the terrorists were “winning” that second firefight at the 2nd location and 2 of the main opposition were KIA, why would they stop? How much longer did fighting go on, if it did? What was the goal of the terroists? Did perhaps our own drone kill our own guys on the rooftop? and then the terrorists scattered? Were we holding prisoners there? Bin laden maybe?


25 posted on 05/15/2013 7:12:30 AM PDT by flowergirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Irenic

Have been thinking about Benghazi ...something that occured to me is after the 2 brave guys(Woods & Dohtery) were killed, did the fighting just stop? Why? if the terrorists were “winning” that second firefight at the 2nd location and 2 of the main opposition were KIA, why would they stop? How much longer did fighting go on, if it did? What was the goal of the terroists? Did perhaps our own drone kill our own guys on the rooftop? and then the terrorists scattered? Were we holding prisoners there? Bin laden maybe?


26 posted on 05/15/2013 7:12:30 AM PDT by flowergirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: flowergirl

They had 4 prisoners, that much I am pretty certain is true. Somebody here on FR had screen-captures showing our people with prisoners and the terrorist that brazenly sipped his fruity drinks and gave interviews to reporters, right out in the open, he said he went to get his 4 people back that were being held.

When those people became prisoners, I don’t know. I want to know more about those 4 prisoners and gun-running.


27 posted on 05/15/2013 7:18:34 AM PDT by Irenic (The pencil sharpener and Elmer's glue is put away-- we've lost the red wheel barrow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: MestaMachine

Anxious to see what you pulled together! No doubt I’ve missed some clues along the way, so much info flying around it’s difficult to keep it all straight!

You have done an amazing job keeping on top of this and informing all of us. Hope you are feeling stronger every day.


28 posted on 05/15/2013 8:01:20 AM PDT by AllAmericanGirl44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: MestaMachine
Look for something horrendous, aimed at distracting the press off of little barry bastard liar's criminalities and onto an event.

Allow me to quote someone who identifies these moves: "Whatever it is, this false flag event needs to be visually and emotionally shocking. So expect children to be sacrificed as part of it. Nothing grabs headlines on CNN faster than the blood of children, and that’s what Hilary Clinton needs right now more than anything else: a powerful, revolting distraction from her own abject criminality.

And believe me, these people would order a thousand children killed if it was necessary to save their political careers. Have no illusions about the kind of power-addicted monsters who are running the U.S. government today. There is nothing they won’t do to weasel out of being caught in a devastating lie."

29 posted on 05/15/2013 8:43:45 AM PDT by MHGinTN (Being deceived can be cured.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

meant to ping you


30 posted on 05/15/2013 8:45:04 AM PDT by MHGinTN (Being deceived can be cured.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Irenic

I also keep wondering if we are going to find out about the four prisoners that they had in Benghazi. That’s what the terrorist talked about in some of his interviews and somebody here on FR had screen captures of our people with prisoners.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3BjOn3pFPU
Paula Broadwell in her Denver speech - cue to 34:40 - mentions “CIA Annex holding a couple of prisoners”


31 posted on 05/15/2013 9:13:04 AM PDT by Grand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Irenic

Some of the video from the aftermath at Benghazi shows a few too many ‘gray bars’, IMO.. No doubt there was a jail there. Having jail bars for a safe room is BS. A terrorist could shoot right through it or fire bomb it quite easily. Those were holding cells.


32 posted on 05/15/2013 10:26:22 AM PDT by GeorgeWashingtonsGhost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Grand

Greg Palkot in Benghazi (gray bar hotel?) after attack.

33 posted on 05/15/2013 10:31:35 AM PDT by GeorgeWashingtonsGhost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts

I think Romney shut up about the attack because the mother of one of those killed did not want her son’s death to become a political football. I understand him not wanting to go there. The media would have been all over the mother and making Romney appear so heartless. Her son did not have a political thought when he rushed to the rescue of Americans in danger. Also, they shut him up by handing him false presidential briefings at that point. (I am guessing at the false part.)


34 posted on 05/15/2013 10:42:52 AM PDT by petitfour
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Freedom of Speech Wins

Conservatives must get militant in their campaigning....not illegal or make unreasonable charges, but get more aggressive and militant in going up against the lies, deceit, and misdirection of the marxist, progressives.


35 posted on 05/15/2013 8:20:28 PM PDT by Texas Songwriter (')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Texas Songwriter

An aspect of the scandals occurred to me. Obama chose to hide the underwear terrorist info. from the American people. So they lied here saying there was no anniversary of Osama’s death attack plan. They didn’t raise the alert level and probably stated it was safe to fly. Then they made fun of Romney in the debates for what he said were the biggest threats to the country. Whole time though they tried to hide what was going on.


36 posted on 05/16/2013 6:51:56 AM PDT by Freedom of Speech Wins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson