In fact, evolution-in-action is observed every day, so it's not even theory, it's fact.
Of course, you can't see it, because you won't accept the theory, so you claim some other word describes it: not "evolution" but "adaption".
But it's the same thing: evolution is simply adaption repeated millions of times, until different descendant groups no longer normally interbreed with each other, at which point scientists identify a new "species".
But before there can be a new species, there must first come adaptions through different breeds and sub-species.
These we see every day.
And the precise scientific interface between a sub-species, species and genus, is often a matter of definitions and debates.
We can see any number of examples, a famous one being Polar Bears: once considered a separate genus, now "downgraded" to just another species within the Ursus genus, among other reasons because it was found they can, and sometimes do, interbreed with brown bears.
mbj: "Evolution "science", falsely so called, simply cannot reproduce the beginning.
Since creation cannot be observed, the deceitful explanations cannot be easily shown for what they are: lies."
It appears that you truly don't know what evolution theory is, and therefore mischaracterize it.
Basic science deals in four general areas:
- observed & confirmed facts (i.e., descent with modifications, natural selection).
- mathematical laws (i.e., Newton's laws of motion)
- Unconfirmed hypotheses / explanations (i.e., abiogenisis, panspermia).
- Confirmed theories (i.e., evolution, "old earth").
Basic facts of evolution (descent with modifications, natural selection) are observed every day.
Evolution theory is confirmed by any number of falsifiable predictions.
Various hypotheses relating to evolution -- i.e., on the origin of life itself -- have not been, and likely cannot be, strongly confirmed, since, as you might point out: even if life could be recreated in a laboratory someday, that would not necessarily confirm it happened in nature, billions of years ago.
So, it is not a matter of scientists telling "lies", but rather of various popularizers failing to distinguish between observed facts, confirmed theories and unconfirmed hypotheses (aka S.W.A.G.s).
mbj: "And every time one falsehood is finally exposed, another plausible theory is hastily devised because the blind faith of anti-God won't seriously even consider any contradicting evidence."
Clearly, you don't understand what the word "science" means, or it's first basic rule: natural explanations for natural processes.
By definition, science cannot deal with supernatural causes or effects, and if you attempt to inject those into science, then the result is, by definition, no longer "science".
It might then be metaphysics, or theology, or religious faith, but it's not "science".
Science by definition only deals with the natural world, not the supernatural.
mbj: "Let evolution 'science', falsely so called, devise an observable, repeatable, testable method to create a simple, single living Maple leaf from raw chemicals and I'll convert."
Obviously, you deeply confuse and misunderstand what science is all about.
Nobody "converts" to science!!
Science is simply a body of natural explanations for natural processes, which you are free to accept or not accept as you may chose.
But what you cannot legitimately do is claim that your religion is just another "science", or that science is just another religion.
By definition, neither are true.
As for possible natural origins of life on earth, there are several unconfirmed hypotheses, including abiogenisis and panspermia.
Nobody is asked to "believe" or "convert" to any of them -- they are simply ideas that some scientists are working to confirm or falsify through various laboratory experiments.
Point is: nothing in science should ever challenge your religious faith, because science by definition is not religious.
The philosophical term for science is "methodological naturalism", meaning it tries to provide natural explanations, without reference to the supernatural, or to ancient texts.