Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: KarlInOhio
Parliament seems to have been trying to centralize control of the British Empire--parallel to what other western European governments were doing in the same period (trying to bring outlying provinces or overseas colonies under greater control of the central government).

In February 1761, James Otis, Jr., gave a long oration against writs of assistance (general search warrants used in enforcing the Navigation Acts). John Adams, who was present, later wrote that "the child independence was then and there born, for every man of an immense crowded audience appeared to me to go away as I did, ready to take arms against writs of assistance."

25 posted on 05/11/2013 9:20:44 AM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: Verginius Rufus

The colonists had plenty to react to. In my own ancestry I found a lot of complaining about being hemmed in by the Proclamation of 1763. They had growing families that needed room to grow and being prohibited from moving west would eventually impoverish them. Things got worse from there.

The Royal Proclamation of 1763
The Currency Act, 1764
The Sugar Act, 1764
The Quartering Act, 1765
The Stamp Act, 1765
The Declaratory Act, 1766 The English Parliament repealed the Stamp Act, but couldn’t leave well enough alone, and adopted this statement of parliamentary supremacy over the British colonies.
The Townshend Act, 1767
The Tea Act, 1773
The Administration of Justice Act, 1774
The Boston Port Act, 1774
The Massachusetts Government Act, 1774
The Quebec Act, 1774
The Quartering Act, 1774


28 posted on 05/11/2013 9:28:37 AM PDT by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson