Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

PROP 13 TAX LOOPHOLE STORY IS AN URBAN MYTH
Calwatchdog.com ^ | May 8, 2013 | Wayne Lusvardi

Posted on 05/08/2013 9:32:28 AM PDT by WayneLusvardi

Stuart Lieberman, a real estate attorney in New Jersey, once said the following about wording in a deed that allowed construction on open space designated land: “That’s not a loophole; it’s the Lincoln Tunnel.”

Lieberman made what appeared to be a loophole in a deed understandable through a concrete example. In the same way, the widely disseminated urban myth in California that there is a mysterious tax loophole in Proposition 13 for owners of commercial properties needs to be simply explained so that the public can understand that there is no such loophole.

A recent news article in the May 4 issue of the Los Angeles Times –- “Prop. 13 Loophole Gives Big Edge to Big Players” — continues to spread and compound the urban myth about a commercial property tax loophole in Proposition 13. Given the controversy over Proposition 13 protections for commercial properties, this so-called tax loophole is exploited for political purposes.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxandhoundsdaily.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: blogpimp; loophole; miramarhotel; prop13

1 posted on 05/08/2013 9:32:28 AM PDT by WayneLusvardi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: WayneLusvardi
The abolition of prop 13 will be the final straw for this state.

Once the parasites, greedbags and night crawlers in CA counties and in Sacramento have access to unlimited property taxes they will be unable to control themselves and collapse will follow.

Guaranteed.

2 posted on 05/08/2013 9:45:25 AM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WayneLusvardi

Good article. I fear in California, you are speaking to an empty room. The groundwork is being laid to get rid of Prop 13. In fact, I am surprised the Latino Marxistas in charge in Sacramento haven’t tried to do it yet. When that happens, property values will drop immediately, the only question being how much.


3 posted on 05/08/2013 9:58:41 AM PDT by Defiant (If there are infinite parallel universes, why Lord, am I living in the one with Obama as President?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WayneLusvardi

So this was an urban myth:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3015949/posts


4 posted on 05/08/2013 10:16:09 AM PDT by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WayneLusvardi

Business is always an easy tax target in California, just look at CARB’s rules.
Split property tax role, will be a test run with disastrous results.


5 posted on 05/08/2013 10:23:55 AM PDT by twistedwrench
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skeeter
It was called Mello-Rouse and it allows the state to catch up at 2% a year.
6 posted on 05/08/2013 12:39:53 PM PDT by Domangart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson