1 posted on
05/05/2013 6:25:53 PM PDT by
Altariel
To: Altariel
A Tomahawk missle would be illegal, and so would an anti-aircraft missle if it was set to automatically fire. This would give an agressor an advantage with weaponry too fast to respond to by humans.
To: Altariel
"Bye now. Just don't piss him off."
3 posted on
05/05/2013 6:32:59 PM PDT by
UCANSEE2
(The monsters are due on Maple Street)
To: Altariel
Directive 4 will take care of it.
4 posted on
05/05/2013 6:33:34 PM PDT by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Islam is a religion of peace, and Moslems reserve the right to detonate anyone who says otherwise.)
To: Altariel
5 posted on
05/05/2013 6:37:26 PM PDT by
swamprebel
(a Constitution once changed from Freedom, can never be restored.)
To: Altariel
Killer robots that can attack targets without any human input obama....
To: Altariel
The UN reserves the Executioner’s place, of course.
8 posted on
05/05/2013 6:41:08 PM PDT by
Hardraade
(http://junipersec.wordpress.com (Vendetta))
To: Altariel
There goes my Cyberdyne stock.
10 posted on
05/05/2013 6:54:25 PM PDT by
CrazyIvan
(Obama's birth certificate was found stapled to Soros's receipt.)
To: Altariel
Will this interfere with my plans to create an Army of flying monkey cyborgs? They look really cute when they fire air to air missiles while throwing poop.
13 posted on
05/05/2013 7:48:08 PM PDT by
Rides_A_Red_Horse
(Why do you need a fire extinguisher when you can call the fire department?)
To: Altariel
I’d like to be first to say,
“Hail, Robot Overlords!”
14 posted on
05/05/2013 7:52:18 PM PDT by
tumblindice
(America's founding fathers: All armed conservatives.)
To: Altariel
"UN report wants to terminate killer robots."
What are they thinking of?
To: Altariel
17 posted on
05/06/2013 10:19:01 AM PDT by
N-R-T
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
