Posted on 05/04/2013 5:04:29 PM PDT by rickmichaels
Earlier this month, in the small coastal city of Swansea, Wales, a 25-year-old man with measles was found dead in his flat. It was the first measles fatality in Britain in five years, and a bleak development in an epidemic caused by a health scare that began here more than a decade and a half ago.
Almost 900 people, mostly children and adolescents, have contracted the disease in recent weeks. Health officials say its the result of a lost generation of children, now roughly 10-18 years old, who did not receive their vaccinations as infants in the 1990s. Back then, there were widely publicized concerns about a link between bowel disease, the MMR vaccinewhich protects children against measles, mumps and rubellaand autism. While the link was later disproved and the 1998 paper that promoted it exposed as fraudulent, many parents, particularly in the Swansea area where the local media took up the story, still failed to get their children immunized. Why this legacy of mistrust took hold in south Wales more strongly than the rest of the country is not entirely known, though most put it down to those early reports, combined with a relatively inward-looking culture. Whats certain is that consequences could be dire.
The Swansea epidemic shows no signs of ending; 121 new cases appeared in the last week. Epidemiologists expect the outbreak could last until the summer holidays and beyond. And there are serious concerns it could spread to other parts of Wales, due to low vaccination rates across that regionas well as across the entire country. It is estimated at least 40,000 children across Wales are currently not vaccinated.
The former surgeon and medical researcher at the centre of the controversy is Andrew Wakefield, who was a senior lecturer and honorary consultant in experimental gastroenterology at the Royal Free Hospital School of Medicine. In 1998, he published a now-infamous paper in the medical journal The Lancet that linked behavioural symptoms with MMR, reporting that the onset of autism began two weeks after infants received their first round of jabs. (His theory was that the measles portion of the vaccine damaged the childrens intestines and eventually their brains.) The paper claimed to have identified a new syndrome, which Wakefield and his co-authors dubbed autistic enterocolitisa behavioural disorder supposedly brought on by MMR and linked to bowel disease.
Many parents of autistic children hailed the research as a breakthrough; not only did it offer a cause for a mysterious and debilitating disorder, it offered a solution, too: a gluten- and dairy-free diet that proponents claimed alleviated symptoms.
Celebrity proponents of the MMR-autism link, most notably Jenny McCarthy, went public promoting the research. But despite 14 major public health studies in countries such as the U.K., U.S., Denmark and Finland, which studied more than 600,000 autistic children, no researchers were able to replicate the link. In fact, the rate of autism was exactly the same in children who had received MMR as those who had not. Wakefields theory was obliterated.
The U.K.s General Medical Council launched an inquiry into allegations of misconduct and, in 2010, found that Wakefield had failed in his duties as a responsible consultant. He was struck off the Medical Register and barred from practising medicine. The Lancet, which published the original paper, issued a full and immediate retraction, and the Sunday Times declared Wakefields autism link an elaborate fraud perpetrated for the personal gain of Andrew Wakefield himself.
Amazingly, none of this has given Wakefield a moment of pause. He has consistently maintained his innocence and the veracity of his findings and continues to promote the idea of an MMR link to autism. Indeed, he took to YouTube earlier this month to defend himself against the latest claims that the outbreak in south Wales was his fault. His bizarre argument is that the government was actually to blame, as it showed more interest in protecting the MMR vaccine than at-risk children and did not heed his advice to administer separate vaccines. The Independent newspaper ran a link to Wakefields screed on the front page of its website and was roundly excoriated for giving him a platform.
Meanwhile, as the media focus on Wakefield, public health workers in south Wales are desperately trying to make sure all unvaccinated children receive their jabs. The lost generation is still at risk. As one Welsh epidemiologist told the BBC, Nowhere in Wales is safe from measles, and I think that is true of the U.K. as a whole. Unrepentant though he is, Andrew Wakefield has a lot to answer for.
. You dont know anything! Youre nothing but a crank shill for the med mafia.
Uh huh. I've seen a movie or two that reflected that level of thinking.
You mean a lightning rod?
That is your best shot Mark.
Looks exactly like your posting would suggest you look like.
Because I converse with folks that are abjectly insane. JR doesn't permit many of them to stay here, but I'll debate with the ones he doesn't jettison, for whatever reason.
I don't have Jesus. Jesus has me (and that's the difference between such as we and the antiCatholics). No doubt you think that He wore three piece suits, button-down shirts, and Italian silk ties along with his leather wingtips. No clue as to what they wore in those years?
Yes we’re all amazed that He hasn’t given you the sani-zot.
What you don’t have is Yeshua.
Jesus means nothing. The Savior’s name has meaning only in “The Language.” Yeshua means Yehova’s Salvation.
I guess that Jesus will just have to retire and let you Judge all men.
Jesus means nothing.
Interesting. And very of note.
The Saviors name has meaning only in The Language. Yeshua means Yehovas Salvation.
Do you have Scripture to prove this or are you merely pulling this from a particular orifice?
I ran a water quality compliance lab for three years, where we documented daily the count of coliform organisms in a liter of the effluent of our five treatment plants. I assure you that I know exactly what exists.
You havent the slightest idea what science even is.
Why do you constantly insist on making a fool of yourself with your false assertions?
My apologies if you are not the person who, a few months ago, was insisting that there is no connection between microorganisms and disease. The tone of your language in this post has me fairly certain that you *are* the same person.
>> “a few months ago, was insisting that there is no connection between microorganisms and disease” <<
.
Wrong again.
Substituting your lack of understanding for the facts that I noted is typical childish science-groupie foolishness.
The “connection” is more due to the condition of the host, than the effects of the microorganism. Were that not so, the entire population would succomb to the infection, and humanity would have become extinct shortly after their day of creation.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.