[Islander7]

'We have established that the genetic foundations for modern Europe were only established in the Mid-Neolithic, after this major genetic transition around 4000 years ago,' says Dr Haak.

'This genetic diversity was then modified further by a series of incoming and expanding cultures from Iberia and Eastern Europe through the Late Neolithic.

[Islander7]

Ping for old dad white guys

[Islander7]

Full title:

Why did European DNA suddenly change 4,000 years ago? Experts reveal evolutionary mystery - and say the makers of Stonehenge may hold the key

[cripplecreek]

Do I have to say it?

[Revolting cat!]

It sounds self-serving, like these Aussie “researchers” trying to prove that there was an invasion from a superior culture down under!

[Dogbert41]

Pre Flood, post flood.

[ColdSteelTalon]

I think.... It’s aliens!!! :-)

[bunkerhill7]

Muslims looking for work

[Mount Athos]

Scientific modeling of the missing link from ancient Bell Beaker culture:

[mountainlion]

King Tut was Haplogroup R1ba2 which is European. I think they are going to find a lot of strange things happened.

[Persevero]

4,000 - 5,000 years ago? Wasn’t that around the time of the Noahic Flood?

[ThunderSleeps]

The monolith?

[LachlanMinnesota]

Circa 7640 BC there were one or more significant cometary impacts which would have had the effect of: (1) destroying much of the survace of the earth and the flora and fauna, including man; and (2) it would have destroyed over one-third of the ozone layer, thus allowing more ultraviolet radiation to reach the Earth, including survivors of the event.

My theory is that the populations roamed as a result of the catastrophe on the local environments so people wondered in search of safety, and they meanwhile were subjected to long-term ultraviolet radiation and an change in the electromagnetic environment of the Earth, disrupted for as much as 1000 years by the comet impact(s).

Radiocarbon onomolies occur for a period of time after the 7640 BC impacts, and then again around 3150 BC. Radiocarbon dating has to be adjusted due to these anomolies.

Enoch tells us all about it...

[Theoria]

[E. Pluribus Unum]

Because the winning-DNA carriers killed all the non-winning-DNA carriers.

[La Lydia]

I am not going to say a word, I promise.

[CrazyIvan]

Was Monsanto around then?

[LachlanMinnesota]

Significantly, researches also noticed a significant increase in motor cycle campgrounds and mobile home parks in areas where the genetics were found to have changed.

[BlueDragon]

[yefragetuwrabrumuy]

The best explanation is a superior cross breed of humans. Think of two tribes, each of which have several useful adaptations or mutations, but when one of each of their number mate with the other ones, they produce children far better than either.

Smarter, stronger, healthier, better metabolism, the kids just run circles around their parents, and the tribe soon dominates, and spreads its genes to other tribes in the region.

A good possibility is an imperfect mutation for high intelligence. There is some speculation that a lot of what we consider intellectualism is a fairly recent development. However it is imperfect because too much of the mutation can have the opposite effect of retardation.

But at that time, an average IQ of 20 to 30 points higher in a tribe would easily result in it becoming dominant.

But almost as important is enhanced fertility, so that there are an increasing number of smart kids running around.

[BenLurkin]

How?

They were exterminated by the Beaker People