Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Jacquerie
In 2011 I posted every day of the Federal Convention to FR. I have a separate post of Mason's objections.

IIRC, it was Wilson who looked around the room and observed that it was populated by a majority of lawyers. He then warned that it they weren't careful that what the people would get would be a government of the same.

Hamilton pooh-poohed Wilson's concern in the Federalist with his usual blustering snow-job. I wish I had the references because the contrast is yet another instance that shows Hamilton for whom he really represented.

35 posted on 04/13/2013 8:15:15 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (An economy is not a zero-sum game, but politics usually is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: Carry_Okie
Wilson wanted direct, popular election of Congressmen, Senators and Presidents. The 17th brought us halfway, and if leftist radicals get their way, we'll have directly elected Presidents soon. Both were/are bad ideas.

In early June at the Constitutional Convention, John Dickinson warned that if all power were “drawn from the people at large, the consequence would be that the national Government would move in the same direction as the State governments now do and would run into all the same mischiefs.” State participation in the new government largely solved the "great desideratum;" how to base a government on popular will, yet protect minority rights from majoritarian abuse.

Had Hamilton not written most of The Federalist, the world's greatest gift to political science and freedom, our Constitution, would have been stillborn.

39 posted on 04/14/2013 3:56:07 AM PDT by Jacquerie (How few were left who had seen the republic! - Tacitus, The Annals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson