Skip to comments.
Got a question for all Bush Family Fans out there, Just What did 12(4 years 41 8 year 42) get us?
19 March 2013
| US Navy Vet
Posted on 03/19/2013 12:25:35 PM PDT by US Navy Vet
Just wondering...
TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: bds; bush; bushlegacy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-117 next last
To: The_Victor
Saved us from presidents Dukakis, Gore, and Kerry.Because actual conservatives couldn't have possibly beat a wimp, a moron and a traitor. /s
61
posted on
03/19/2013 12:43:44 PM PDT
by
TigersEye
(The irresponsible should not be leading the responsible.)
To: US Navy Vet
Not Dukkakis, Not Gore, Not Kerry and his beloved jane fonda.
We got Sarah.
62
posted on
03/19/2013 12:44:01 PM PDT
by
mountainlion
(Live well for those that did not make it back.)
To: The_Victor
But, W’s ineptitude got us 0bama - who has been worse than all those three could’ve been due to his cult of personality.
To: US Navy Vet
Utter WILLFUL failure on borders.
To: what's up
And just HOW MANY of these “MSM lies” did Bush or his Toadies EVER refute...Bueller...Bueller...Bueller? ZERO!
65
posted on
03/19/2013 12:44:30 PM PDT
by
US Navy Vet
(Go Packers! Go Rockies! Go Boston Bruins! See, I'm "Diverse"!)
To: US Navy Vet
a reasonable assurance we won’t have 4 or 8 years of Jeb
66
posted on
03/19/2013 12:44:56 PM PDT
by
bigbob
To: Lou Budvis
Don’t forget, the 49ers gave us the Ravens.
67
posted on
03/19/2013 12:45:22 PM PDT
by
1rudeboy
To: US Navy Vet
Would you have preferred President Dukakis, President Gore, and President Kerry?
68
posted on
03/19/2013 12:45:54 PM PDT
by
Bubba_Leroy
(The Obamanation Continues)
To: Parmenio
That assumes that Dukakis would have won if it hadn't been GHW Bush, an unlikely proposition. It also assumes that Clinton would have won in 1992 against someone other than Bush, an unlikely proposition. It also assumes that even if Gore was running in 2000 as the sitting VP (if Clinton is not Prez then that is not the case), that if you run a real conservative, he would not win. I think that is not true.
The question is a good one; I believe, and have for quite a while, that the Bush family views it as their calling to oversee the leftward move of the US Government in a moderate way, and certainly does not see the New Deal and Great Society as things to be repealed.
69
posted on
03/19/2013 12:46:31 PM PDT
by
Defiant
(If there are infinite parallel universes, why Lord, am I living in the one with Obama as President?)
To: US Navy Vet
Why are you even asking, just to have your point of view verified by people who do not like Bush either?
70
posted on
03/19/2013 12:46:41 PM PDT
by
svcw
(Why is one cell on another planet considered life, and in the womb it is not.)
To: Defiant
If Bush didn’t run in 92, would Perot have run?
71
posted on
03/19/2013 12:47:02 PM PDT
by
dfwgator
To: US Navy Vet; All
As a side note to Bush-basing, please consider the following.
With all due respect to the family, friends and supporters of the late Ronald Reagan, I can’t think of any 20th century president, even conservative presidents, that weren’t oblivious to Congress’s Section 8, Article I-limited powers.
Conservative does not necessarily mean respect for the federal government’s constitutionally limited powers.
To: 1rudeboy
Do you believe, that if several years down the road, a future administration changes a good policy to bad, then the previous administration did no good at all?
73
posted on
03/19/2013 12:47:21 PM PDT
by
thackney
(life is fragile, handle with prayer)
To: US Navy Vet
Unending wars in Iraq And Bumphukistan.
74
posted on
03/19/2013 12:48:19 PM PDT
by
The_Media_never_lie
(Actually, they lie when it suits them! The crooked MS media must be defeated any way it can be done!)
To: thackney
No, not at all. That’s why I corrected the person who posted this thread. The marginal tax rates on all income brackets except the highest are lower, thanks to Bush 43.
75
posted on
03/19/2013 12:49:52 PM PDT
by
1rudeboy
To: Lou Budvis
But, Ws ineptitude got us 0bama - who has been worse than all those three couldve been due to his cult of personality. There's no reason to expect we wouldn't have had president 0bama anyway. Imagine where we'd be with him following president Gore or Kerry.
76
posted on
03/19/2013 12:49:52 PM PDT
by
The_Victor
(If all I want is a warm feeling, I should just wet my pants.)
To: US Navy Vet
Bush 41, kicked saddam out of kuwait, did a miraculous job of containing the S and L crises, was the last president that both parties looked up to in terms of personal character.
Bush 43 brought us “the bush tax cuts”, recovery from 9-11, kicked saddam out of Iraq, kept “Kyoto Al” out of the white house.
77
posted on
03/19/2013 12:52:51 PM PDT
by
staytrue
To: US Navy Vet
To: dfwgator
“Saddams head.
Which 41 should have gotten back in 1991. “
Actually, 41 was smart enough to not invade Iraq, 43 probably made a wrong decision to do so.
79
posted on
03/19/2013 12:55:33 PM PDT
by
staytrue
To: TexasCajun
“Miss me Yet?” About as much as I “Miss” another “Fine””Texan” LBJ.
80
posted on
03/19/2013 12:56:28 PM PDT
by
US Navy Vet
(Go Packers! Go Rockies! Go Boston Bruins! See, I'm "Diverse"!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-117 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson