Posted on 02/23/2013 6:37:39 PM PST by righttackle44
Is Spielberg, an ardent Democrat supporter, warning the American people by showing his outstanding film that bad things can happen to helpless populations? Or is he simply observing the 20-years since the making of a movie about the Nazi destruction of the Jewish people?
There is certainly a theme in the film about an unarmed population being overtaken by a military force unafraid to shoot civilians. And so today we have military commanders who have assured Obama that they are prepared to follow illegal orders and also do this very thing.
Or am I being paranoid?
You’re reading too much into it.
20 years and it’s Oscar season.
It’s a wonderful dream, that a Liberal with the political and cultual heft of Spielberg would “GET IT”, is pure paranoia.. Sorry.. :(
Maybe it is a coincidence that they are showing Shindler’s List, but it is Oscar night too. Remember Spielberg is a staunch supporter of the Usurper. I guess he hasn’t learned a thing and you know what happens? History repeats itself.
So, Spielberg decides where and when which of his movies is shown? Who knew?!
It’s probably a preview of coming events, except this time people will be forced to wear a yellow Bill of Rights patch on their clothing....
It’s Purim. See the book of Esther.
BINGO
Do you know why the Nazis felt justified in destroying the Jewish population? They considered themselves the victims of the Jews, because Jews were too successful. It was another kind of class warfare, just like in communist nations. And just like what liberals today are attempting to inflame again, with their constant complaining about “greedy corportations”, and greedy conservatives who won’t share the wealth. So the Nazis took away what the Jews had and by way of it their lives as well.
I worked with a Jewish woman who told me that Schindler armed the Jews who were working for him. They seemed to leave this out of the movie.
Show us links to credible information supporting your assertion. Spielberg would waste his “power” on requesting a TV network to show a film of his on this or that date.
Not paranoid, more like deluded to think a TV programmer has an ulterior motive in showing one of the generally avowed top ten films of all time. They are probably constantly looking for any excuse to show it.
The best outcome - a “Who is John Galt” exercise, the actual reason - money.
and who will be our Queen Esther to save us from a heartless king, a wicked advisor, and a corrupt government? Who will be the Mordecai to advise our Queen that she is alive for such a time as this?
I cling to the hope of God’s justice in all things...
and who will be our Queen Esther to save us from a heartless king, a wicked advisor, and a corrupt government? Who will be the Mordecai to advise our Queen that she is alive for such a time as this?
I cling to the hope of God’s justice in all things...
and who will be our Queen Esther to save us from a heartless king, a wicked advisor, and a corrupt government? Who will be the Mordecai to advise our Queen that she is alive for such a time as this?
I cling to the hope of God’s justice in all things...
USA Network is owned by NBC Universal, Schindler’s List was distributed by Universal, so Spielberg isn’t showing anything. He’s nowhere in that decision tree.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.