Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/17/2013 8:42:06 PM PST by Kevmo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: dangerdoc; citizen; Liberty1970; Red Badger; Wonder Warthog; PA Engineer; glock rocks; free_life; ..

The Cold Fusion/LENR Ping List

http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/coldfusion/index?tab=articles

Keywords: ColdFusion; LENR; lanr; CMNS
business, news, extended, tech


http://lenr-canr.org/


2 posted on 02/17/2013 8:44:10 PM PST by Kevmo ("A person's a person, no matter how small" ~Horton Hears a Who)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kevmo

Ain’t no FReeper going to read that!


3 posted on 02/17/2013 8:47:09 PM PST by Red_Devil 232 (VietVet - USMC All Ready On The Right? All Ready On The Left? All Ready On The Firing Line!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kevmo
That was particularly unreadable.

Is there an executive summary?

/johnny

4 posted on 02/17/2013 8:47:29 PM PST by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kevmo

I don’t have to be exposed to rude comments to understand the laity’s unease about nanotechnology.

The idea that something very small can be injected into the human body during a vaccination, without the knowledge of the person receiving the injection, scares the Hell out of me. Such a technology in the hands of a tyrant dictator...you get my drift!

So no, I do not like nanotechnology. I do think it could have wide and vaired applications in space, such as in zero gravity manufacturing, but I really do not want it used here, earthside.


5 posted on 02/17/2013 8:50:58 PM PST by SatinDoll (NATURAL BORN CITZEN: BORN IN THE USA OF CITIZEN PARENTS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kevmo

They can’t even put up with “rude” or critical blog comments? The left is so thin-skinned.


7 posted on 02/17/2013 8:51:24 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet (I'll raise $2million for Sarah Palin's presidential run. What'll you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kevmo

Their basic summary is that the people cynical of whatever’s posted have no idea of what they’re talking about. I think it’s a fatal assumption.

What’s a nasty reply from one person’s view is pretty darn funny from another’s.

And they used terrible examples. Global warming? The fact that 30 years ago these “experts” were talking abiout a global ice age? I mean the posters are cynical but their cynicism isn’t based in lies but in what others actually did and said and were promoting just as hard hte the global warming nuts. And we’ve had temperature data around showing the global “warming” really ended pretty much in the late 1990s. That their models have never incorporated the sun into them as a factor in the global temperature, or the oceans. The fact that there have been many, many instances of incorrectly calibrated and improperly placed temperature sensors giving artificially high data because they were next to heat ducts, on blacktop, etc.

oh look,now I’m one of them.


8 posted on 02/17/2013 8:51:46 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (I can neither confirm or deny that; even if I could, I couldn't - it's classified.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kevmo

You know they say nobody listens to us, they think we don’t even deserve a response from them anyway. I don’t know why they bother since nobody pays attention to us.

Maybe their itty bitty baby feewings are huwt.


9 posted on 02/17/2013 8:53:14 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (I can neither confirm or deny that; even if I could, I couldn't - it's classified.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kevmo

Obviously the government needs to enact “common sense” speech control.


11 posted on 02/17/2013 9:05:42 PM PST by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kevmo

Trolls win for rude blog comments? Yes, telling the truth is frequently considered rude...by those “outed”.


14 posted on 02/17/2013 9:59:58 PM PST by JimRed (Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed &water the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS, NOW & FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kevmo

You have a good point. So from now on only happy, happy thoughts and happy, happy comments on cold fusion and the devices utilizing it that are certain to come on the market this year or next will be permitted.

I may even change my tag line to “Don’t Worry, Be Happy (or else)”.


16 posted on 02/18/2013 12:18:58 AM PST by count-your-change (you don't have to be brilliant, not being stupid is enough)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kevmo
"What you do, if you are a serious scientist operating according to the established method, is attempt to falsify your hypothesis. Test it to destruction; carry out serious attacks on its weakest points to see if they hold up. If they do... then you have a theory that can be published, and tested, and verified by other scientists. If you don't, you throw it out."

Global Warming Fraud and the Future of Science - J. R. Dunn

The "scientists" who perpetrated the global warming scam approached their science in exactly the opposite manner as the approach described above. They formulated a theory based on political ideology (as well as the path of least resistance to "grant" money) and then did whatever they had to do with their data to "prove" it.

What the world has now seen with the expose of the "global warming"/"climate change" scam through the leaked email dumps of November 2009 and November 2011 puts a new spin on the old saying: "Figures can lie and liars can figure." The discipline of science has taken a massive hit over the past three-plus years and it could take decades for science - - and scientists - - to regain any credibility with the public. A lot of that burden must fall on honest scientists, and the first and most important thing they must do is scream for the heads of Michael Mann, Phil Jones, and the rest of the "climategate" fraudsters. I guess we'll see if they have the integrity to do it. (No, I am not holding my breath.)

17 posted on 02/18/2013 12:56:17 AM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kevmo

If you think that’s bad... Try talking about smaller, more limited Constitutional governance without getting trolled by bigger government Nanny State RINO’s.


21 posted on 02/18/2013 8:12:20 AM PST by Dead Corpse (I will not comply.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kevmo

The article is interesting but the footnotes are *murder.*


31 posted on 02/21/2013 7:39:51 PM PST by Cyber Liberty (I am a dissident. Will you join me? My name is John....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All; y'all; et al; Ping; everyone; Lurker; no one in particular; noone
For rapidly developing nanotechnology, a technology already built into more than 1,300 consumer products, exposure to uncivil online comments is one of several variables that can directly influence the perception of risk associated with it. Well, that explains the
AdamHenry*BandWagon Index.

49 posted on 03/08/2014 10:52:41 PM PST by Kevmo ("A person's a person, no matter how small" ~Horton Hears a Who)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Ashley Anderson explains: "When people encounter an unfamiliar issue like nanotechnology, they often rely on an existing value such as religiosity or deference to science to form a judgment,"

I guess Ashley believes deference to science is a form of intransigence.

And of course we have those fools that engage in religiosity...

Ashley Anderson, a postdoctoral fellow in the Center for Climate Change Communication at George Mason University and the lead author of the upcoming study in the Journal of Computer Mediated Communication.


51 posted on 03/08/2014 11:21:25 PM PST by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kevmo
Criticizing global warming actually accelerates global warming!

Quick! Send money to Al Gore so he can continue to fight both global warming and rude criticism of global warming and Al Gore!

52 posted on 03/09/2014 6:45:14 AM PDT by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson