Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: dynachrome

Actually, the income tax was already constitutional. The 16th amendment authorized a PROGRESSIVE income tax (”without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration” meant different rates could be applied to different people).


11 posted on 02/03/2013 12:10:12 PM PST by Constitutionalist Conservative (I'm a constitutionalist, not a libertarian. Huge difference.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Constitutionalist Conservative
The 16th amendment authorized a PROGRESSIVE income tax (”without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration” meant different rates could be applied to different people).

And so the dream of Karl Marx was finally achieved.

13 posted on 02/03/2013 1:00:21 PM PST by Marathoner (Our forefathers would be shooting by now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: Constitutionalist Conservative

actually, pre-1913 federal taxes were only applied to the state... not the individual.

the founders fought a war to get away from big govt and taxes on the individual... do you think they would want this??


17 posted on 02/03/2013 1:45:59 PM PST by sten (fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson