Posted on 01/26/2013 3:13:31 PM PST by agondonter
Edited on 01/26/2013 3:25:39 PM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]
oops - broken link
Please show where I claimed such. Let me save you the time. I didn't.
What I have said is true. All three sources are notoriously unreliable yet you claim your argument is valid because you cite these sources. Logic tells us that you have no sound argument because all you have is what the Gub'ment and the MSM have claimed to be fact. These are the same people who claimed the Ambassador in Benghazi died as the result of a protest against a youtube video that got a little rowdy.
And that my friend is cold hard fact!
So then does that mean that the consulate in Benghazzi didn't burn down, and that the ambassador is still alive, and none of it ever happened???
I’m not trying to get into this discussion per se but isn’t the 5.56 NATO basically interchangeable with the .223 Remington?
If so then there could have been only one or both at the site depending upon what Lanza’s mother had purchased.
See, the point is I can't tell you with any certainty. Why? Because we know the Gub'ment and the MSM lies!
So when you claim something is true because you saw it on NBC OR a Gub'ment official issued a report then you are in the exact same boat. You don't know its truth BECAUSE the people you get your info from are notorious liars!
You keep taking people to task because they cite evidence that a gun was reported found in a trunk of a car because it was reported on TV News. You in turn cite evidence to the contrary and state your view is right because your source is from...
wait for it...
wait for it...
the TV News.
Bottom line neither of you have any real evidence of the truth. Why? because no one is this scenario can be trusted at this point.
Same for Benghazi. The reporting on it is ALL POLITICAL. Its not reporting of the facts its a move to further and agenda on both sides!
But then why are you so upset at the MSM for claiming that the Ambassador in Benghazi died at all???
What proof is there other than the MSM that there ever was an ambassador over there or even a consulate??? or even a Libya??? ever been there???
So kick back and relax. There was no ambassador, no consulate, no Libya because you only have the MSM's word for those things -- and the MSM can't be trusted.
Who said I was upset?
I just pointed out your "proof" is anything but. Repeat after me "the Gub'ment and the MSM lies."
Citing them as sources is an exercise in futility.
“saw 5.56 casings all over the place - which means he also had to see the ammo that hadnt been shot”
I wouldn’t draw that conclusion. Two people could see the same casings laying around, and one could describe them as .223s and another as 5.56s. For the casual observer, it would probably just depend on which one they are more familiar with. It’s kind of like how an American might say someone was 6 feet tall, while a European would say the same person was 2 meters tall.
That's why most try to bypass them and go right to the source -- the police and eye-witnesses themselves.
How does one "bypass" the Gub'ment by talking to the police?
(Here is a hint. You can't. They are part of the "Gub'ment")
and the eyewitnesses — who are they???
5.56 NATO is interchangeable with a .223 in the Bushmaster because Bushmaster says their barrels have always been made to take a 5.56. I posted the link to an Ammo manufacturer who said that just because a gun is stamped 5.56 doesn’t mean it has the right barrel. Don’t use a 5.56 in a .223 barrel etc etc etc. But I found a link where Bushmaster says it is okay with their gun.
I saw one poster on a gun site say his wasn’t made to take a 5.56 but it was a defective one.
The only reason this has come up is because someone claims that an EMS worker that was inside the school WHO KNOWS GUNS says the place was littered with 5.56 casings.
But then the poster seems to start backtracking and saying that .223 is like 5.56 etc etc etc and then has gone AWOL on the discussion - as if he found out that maybe there weren’t 5.56 casings there but .223.
You mean the ones that are reported to have been asked by the Gub'ment not to talk?
Good question.
No — I mean the ones that already have talked.
.
.
Of possible interest.
Iroqouis Gas Line Through Newtown, CT
http://sandyhooktruth.wordpress.com/2013/01/25/iroqouis-gas-line-through-newtown-ct/
.
Where did you see this?
Here — you might find this interesting:
http://www.humanevents.com/2011/02/15/223-remington-vs-556-nato-what-you-dont-know-could-hurt-you/
I already posted that
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2981821/posts?page=130#130
Multiple places
And they are neither gub’mnt or msm.
Interesting post 95.
icwhatudo, take a look at the link.
I remember the work you did in 2009 regarding taxand property records.
Of possible interest.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.