I wonder what's up?
Since the Left does and feels the exact same things when they are in power, it is safe to assume that party politics is a form of bread and circuses to keep the stupid entertained - and critical observers had best ignore the performers and keep their eyes on what the ringmasters are doing.
She’s the real (as opposed to msm) front-runner for the nomination in 2016. Of course they need to attack her and laud Chris Christie and Jeb Bush.
They just don’t have anyone else to direct their
jabbering insanity at.
They fear her and are tyong to get out in front of any candidacy since Prince Andrew Cuomo decided to end his presidential campaign last Tuesday
A Republican removed STATE OWNED weapons from a minimally trained militia and the left has a coronary!?
Had one of these under-trained individuals caused a problem or get injured and the Dems would be screaming for everyone’s PRIVATE PROPERTY to be removed!
Eff ‘em!
Anybody who can fact-check this?
Texas also broke up a state militia group during the mid 1980s, it was felt that they were suffering from self induced “mission creep” caused by an ex-Army Special Forces commander, who was concentrating on guns, camouflage and combat training, instead of state militia duties.
Without even looking, I can just about guarantee you that the STATE stopped arming these folks with STATE OWNED weapons.
They were perfectly free to buy firearms on their own.
The author trying to claim that not arming “state militia” members is the same as going house to house to disarm every private citizen. Apparently the author wants us to believe that these were privately owned weapons, but if they were privately owned weapons I don’t see how Palin could take them away privately owned weapons from people just because they belong to the state militia, without taking everyone’s privately owned weapons away- which of course she didn’t- so it sounds like the author is really stretching on this one. Perhaps these were state supplied arms?
I’m sure the libs have or would at other times use this same “state militia” to justify taking 2nd amendment rights away from everyone “because, after all,” the libs would say, “we have an official militia and so there’s no reason for just any private citizen to be armed.”
These people are desperate/insane....as always.
Plain didn’t take any one’s private weapons, she simply decided that her State Defense Forces would not bear arms while on State Active Duty. It might come as a surprise to the moron who wrote this bravo sierra, but the vast majority of members of the United States Armed Forces are not issued personal weapons. Until I read something different, written by someone with a clue, I’ll assume that Palin was acting properly to assure that her State Defence Forces were a valuable tool of her Adjutant General’s Department, and not just a bunch of lunk heads running around the woods in XXL ACUs.
Plain didn’t take any one’s private weapons, she simply decided that her State Defense Forces would not bear arms while on State Active Duty. It might come as a surprise to the moron who wrote this bravo sierra, but the vast majority of members of the United States Armed Forces are not issued personal weapons. Until I read something different, written by someone with a clue, I’ll assume that Palin was acting properly to assure that her State Defence Forces were a valuable tool of her Adjutant General’s Department, and not just a bunch of lunk heads running around the woods in XXL ACUs.
The left wants to dismantle the military, so what’s the problem here?
Palin technically disbanded a state-armed militia! Why aren’t the liberal nuts dancing in the aisles for her?
I’m sorry did Palin say they could no longer own their own weapons in their own houses?
Palin is the heart of conservatism; a common sense thinker. She is the real deal.
The MSM are frightened we all will rally around her again!
They are in the early stages of picking who they want to run on the GOP ticket.
One thing I say for the left: they never let the facts get in the way of a pet narrative.....
I’m still trying to figure out what the hell the author of this diatribe meant when he/she wrote : “Republican exceptionalism demands that we attribute equal weight to non-exerts.”
Are non-exerts really inerts?
“.....Only two address limiting the availability of a category of gun or a magazine capacity.......”
Which two were these?
It was so mealymouthed and vague I couldn’t distinguish anything......
C’mon Bratch, you could of read the header of the website and saw this...you put credence in this?????
POLITICUS USA
Real Liberal Politics...No Corporate Money...No Masters
(((Pictures of Obama and Senator Sanders)))
EPIC FAIL!!!!
The moderator over there is a complete barking moonbat of an Obama whoreshipping leftist. Don’t expect any factual post to last long.