US District Court Judge Henry Wingate has two copies of Obama’s long form COLB at this very moment. Orly Taitz submitted one copy and Obama’s attorneys submitted the other with their pleadings in Taitz v Mississippi Democratic Party Executive Committee, Obama, et. al.
Obama’s attorneys also submitted a Letter of Verification from Alvin Onaka in Hawaii and they asked Judge Wingate to take Judicial Notice of the Letter from Dr. Onaka.
Judge Wingate has not yet acted on any of the exhibits submitted with the pleadings or motions.
Please, no copies of a pdf.
The Mississippi Democratic Executive Committee’s verification request is what convinced me that my understanding of the law was legally sound. The MDEC attorneys said they needed a verification because the legitimacy of the White House BC image and the truth of the claims on it were at stake in the case - but then they made their request to specifically NOT ask for verification of either of those things. They knew Onaka couldn’t verify either of those things, because he wouldn’t for Bennett. So they fashioned their request to take advantage of the fig leaf Onaka had used in the verification for Bennett: that the information “matches”. Like I said elsewhere, the information contained on my $2 will match the information contained on anybody else’s $2 bill, but none of them will legally be worth a thing. It doesn’t matter what is contained on a legally non-valid BC, because it has no legal value anyway.
I haven’t read the whole MDEC case, but I suspect that their inclusion of the White House image is as part of the exhibit showing the communications between them and the HDOH, where they asked if the claims on the White House image “match” the claims on the HDOH record. If so, they were not submitting the White House image itself as evidence, but were submitting the VERIFICATION as evidence.
What Orly should do is submit the verification to Bennett, where Onaka indirectly confirmed that the record at the HDOH is legally non-valid and Onaka could not verify that the White House image is a “true and accurate representation of the original record on file”. That way, the judge would know that the claims “matching” means nothing, since the claims are made on a non-valid record.
Orly’s been so busy, I didn’t want to bother her with more stuff, but it would really help her if she understood what the letter of verification for Bennett really means.
I’m pretty sure those are NOT Obama’s lawyers and the LFBCs are only photocopies (or printouts) of the layered PDF posted at Obama’s website. Obama supposedly has two hard copies he obtained from the Hawaii Department of Health, but NEITHER has seen the light of day in any court of law.