From my understanding, Bonds deserves to be in the Hall of Fame based on his pre-1999 record.
Everything I’ve heard indicates that Bonds did not start “bulking up” until 1999. I could be wrong, of course.
Bonds’ record through 1998 is truly great and easily HOF worthy. You could cut him off after 1995 and he would still be HOF worthy.
>>>From my understanding, Bonds deserves to be in the Hall of Fame based on his pre-1999 record.
Everything I’ve heard indicates that Bonds did not start “bulking up” until 1999. I could be wrong, of course.
Bonds’ record through 1998 is truly great and easily HOF worthy. You could cut him off after 1995 and he would still be HOF worthy.<<<
So, if a man made $500 million dollars honestly, but then robbed orphans and widows to make his next $500 million, we should consider him a “Hall of Fame” businessman, and not hold the stealing against him? After all, he was already rich when he started stealing.