“He has zero authority over his little son and when things go wrong he encouraged his child to shake down a company to replace his toy.”
This is intellectual dishonesty. Even when reminded of the legal meaning of “shake down”, you persist in using the term. You compound your intellectual dishonesty with a libelous claim about the father’s parenting abilities, when you do not know the man nor have evidence to support it.
Do you train your children to be intellectually dishonest? Do you suppose intellectual dishonesty is a sign of great moral turpitude?
Do you suppose intellectual dishonesty is a conservative trait?
How is that letter to Daddy coming? Or is your concern for the boy’s moral development as fictitious as Bill Clinton’s “I feel your pain”?
” Daddy said to send you a email to see if you will send me another one.”
Hmmm...daddy said to send a email to “see” if you will send me another one (FREE)”
And you are defending this “daddy” on Free Republic and trying to shame me who believes this “daddy” is using his little cute kid to “shake down” a company? This story unfolded in less than 2 weeks and went viral. Do you think that this same daddy who was “pleased” with the response from Lego wouldn’t be quick to post the opposite story if things didn’t go his way?