Something VERY significant is being hidden here. Perhaps she would have no choice but to implicate 0bama directly in the 1) draw down of security prior to the attack, 2) refusal to provide Stevens with security on the day of 9/11, 3) refusal to send military troops to rescue the Americans, 4) the pre-election Benghazi cover-up by ALL regime players, specifically 0bama, Hillary and Rice to label the attack a 'protest' and not a 'terrorist attack' and to blame an American filmmaker but NOT the terrorists responsible for the attack. A massive cover-up to protect 1) 0bama so as not to negatively impact his re-election bid and/or 2) the terrorists?
I'm surprised 0bama didn't classify Benghazi as 'workplace violence' due to his history of PROTECTING ISLAMIC EXTREMISTS!
Soros used President Clinton and American air power to make money in the 90s. The Democrats, under Bush’s nose, made off with billions from the Iraq reconstruction. Obama has been setting the Middle East on fire for profit. He may be a secret Moslem but there’s no secret that he’s a war profiteer.
I agree.
They are hiding something BIG.
If Plan A doesn’t work, she’s getting Plans B, C, D, and E set up. The longer she’s out with Benghazi-itis, the bigger whatever it is that needs covering up.
Ron Brown conveniently set the stage of his demise by being aboard a U.S. controlled aircraft over a foreign nation at a time when his testimony could have embarassed the current administration.
If Hillary is helping to create this "convenient" situation, her epitaph will not read, "Here lies the world's smartest woman".