Posted on 12/24/2012 5:22:51 PM PST by Kolath
n an article in the Boston Globe, Tagg Romney reveals that his father Mitt Romney had very little desire to run for president and really wasn't interested in the job. Therefore, Mitt Romney wasted millions of dollars in donations and everyone's time by running for president. Did this shock us conservatives? No. Tagg Romney's comments in this article confirms what most of us conservatives knew about Romney already. A important prerequisite for running for president is simple—you must want the job and also play to win. If the republican party does not clean up its act in the near future it will be over as a political party.
(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...
I wonder if they will ever have the common sense to realize that intentionally leaving Sarah Palin and Ron Paul out of the mix was suicidal.
We pretty much know, but cannot prove, that the mega-fraud on the left was the only reason Hussein “won” again.
You’re right. There’s no way in hell Romney didn’t want to win. He’d have had an easy, early “out” in the primaries and that could’ve been his suicide pill, but he was determined to win. The RINO Did some not-too-nice things in the process, and did some flip-flopping.
I’m thinking Tagg’s statement was a version of sour grapes.
The last -five- times you pulled this crap, it didn’t end well for you. So instead of spending the Christmas holiday attacking a conservative woman and her supporters, why not keep your misogyny to your self and try reflecting on the reason for the season?
Just a suggestion.
Failing to show “proper reverence” constitutes an attack?
Whatever.
Merry Christmas.
May well have been sour grapes, but until someone can come up with a logical explanation why he spent millions ripping his GOP ‘opposition’ and conservatives to shreds while ignoring some of Obama’s biggest disasters, it sure looks like he was far from all in on the deal.
And it seems that several times when the ball started rolling his way. one of his inner circle would choke on TV or in print. The “Etch a Sketch’ blunder being a prime example.
Any businessman that had such incompetent management under him would have never become a captain of industry or finance in the real world. Romney clearly was. So one can pretty easily conclude that his run had a motive other than victory.
Failing to show basic decency and equating someone to a friggin WMD by playing spelling games like a 3rd grader constitutes a level of stupidity seen pretty often when you respond to a post with Palin’s name in it.
As I often say Gunner, you are what you are. And what you are is obvious.
What I am is not impressed.
I haZ a sad for you. See? This is my sad face :(
Tragic.
And like clockwork, we get to the point of the flamewar where Humblegunner has to get the one last word in with no defense of his stupidity. Just ‘cuz’.
Tragic indeed.
Defense? Defense of what? Having a preference? A personal dislike?
I had no idea I needed to defend that.
I also dislike Lima beans. Need I defend that too?
I believe your first post was an irrational scholyard type attack on Palin. A common occurrence, but a liberal one. When you put forth an assertion, expect to defend it. Debate 101.
But alas you are you and rules of decency and commonly accepted debate don’t apply. Nor do any consequences. We all live in Gunnerworld where Lord Blog cop does as he will and his word is gospel. In his mind anyway.
...Or you could get a large hammer and a bag of rock salt. Pound as needed.
;)
Merry Christmas woogums. Try to develop a sense of decency. For the children.
I "asserted" that removing the middle part of her name leaves you with "Sarin".
It's humor. Try some.
Can't really see a need to "defend" since it's kind of self evident.
Is she so fragile that she can't be joked about? Or maybe too revered for dismissive humor.. like the Pope?
Some folks sure seem to get their kickers in a knot about it for damn sure.
So why is it that you can’t allow a thread to pass without some asinine assertion?
When you have a reason to disagree with her proposals, post it. When you have a desire to just stir crap, have the gust to just admit it.
The fact that you despise her is obvious. We all know that. We also don’t care. But when you have to ‘imply’ a woman is a prostitute and play name games like a freaking gradeschooler the only person whose stock falls ain’t the target of your affections.
So keep running your mouth uselessly and one of her many devoted cultists will pop in to defend our Sarah, she who is second only to God ;)
Now if you will excuse me I have a puppy to slaughter on her altar.
If you rearrange humblegunner you get, “Numb Lunge Her”
Coincidence? I think not...
Boy does THAT ever paint an accurate picture of the situation!!!
LOLOLOLOL!!!!
Have fun, be safe.
Actually, she was the only reason the Tea Party did so well in the 2010 mid-terms. No other Republican stuck their neck out to endorse conservative candidates or even to encourage the opposition against Obamacare, passed in March, 2010.
She was the reason the House reverted to the GOP, and that idiot Boehner got his job back.
Of course, we cannot give her any credit.
There is no question that she took on the corrupt GOP in Alaska and sent them packing. She would have done the same thing in DC, and that is why the GOP-e is scared to death of her.
As for being a half term quitter,the reasons were quite clear, and it is disingenuous of you to imply otherwise. In one fell swoop, she deflated the Left's vicious campaign to neutralize her even AFTER the 2008 campaign was over, in a bald faced effort to ruin her politically and financially. That cleared her for her meritorious service in the 2010 midterms. I have no doubt she was warned that the establishment would destroy her if she tried to run.
She is the enemy of the elites on both sides of the aisle, and is precisely her or someone just like her who is needed to boot the elites out of DC and to get our country back.
She is this generation's Ronald Reagan, who also enjoyed the privilege of being on the GOP-E's s-list.And we all see how right Reagan was.
If your political ‘excitement’ over a female politician lasts longer than 4 hours, see a doctor....And that... er...’numbness’ may eventually subside.
“In one fell swoop, she deflated the Left’s vicious campaign to neutralize her even AFTER the 2008 campaign was over,”
Not completely. Gunner is still posting their crap at every opportunity. Same tactics. Often verbatim.
Other than that, you’re dead on right.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.