Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Next, consider television sets, a fairly common holiday gift. In 1958, American holiday shoppers paid $269.95 for Sears’s “best 24-inch console TV” (see photo above), or 136.34 hours of work at the average hourly wage then. Today you can purchase a Sansui 26-inch LCD high-definition TV (see picture above) on the Sears website for $249.98 (or choose from the several hundred other TVs available), which would be a “time cost” today of only 13.03 hours of work at today’s hourly wage of $19.19, for a 90 percent reduction in the cost of today’s HDTV compared to the 1958 model.

...Phono vs Ipod

1 posted on 12/21/2012 2:40:21 PM PST by virgil283
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: virgil283

So, how does the price of Diesel work out?


2 posted on 12/21/2012 2:45:49 PM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: virgil283
HERE
3 posted on 12/21/2012 2:46:07 PM PST by knarf (I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: virgil283
 

Christmas shopping: 1958 vs. 2012

| December 19, 2012, 1:33 pm

One way to illustrate your good fortune of being a holiday shopper today is to measure the cost of consumer goods by the number of hours it takes working at the average hourly wage to earn enough income to purchase typical consumer products at their retail prices, and then compare the “time cost” of goods from the past to today’s “time cost” for similar items (this is an update of a CD post in 2009).  (Don Boudreaux has been featuring some similar comparisons in a series on Café Hayek titled “Cataloging Our Progress,” which inspired this post.)

For example, the retail price of an automatic Kenmore two-slice toaster advertised in the 1958 Sears Christmas Catalog (available here online, and pictured below on the left) was $12.95, or 6.54 hours of work at the average hourly manufacturing wage of $1.98 in 1958 (wage data here). Today you can buy a comparable Kenmore two-slice toaster for $25.99, and the “time cost” would be only 1.35 hours of work at the current average hourly wage of $19.19, for a reduction of almost 80 percent since 1958 in the amount of work hours required to earn the income necessary to purchase a standard toaster. Additionally, the Sears website today features more than 100 different toasters, compared to the Sears catalog in 1958, which only featured a few different models.

Next, consider television sets, a fairly common holiday gift. In 1958, American holiday shoppers paid $269.95 for Sears’s “best 24-inch console TV” (see photo above), or 136.34 hours of work at the average hourly wage then. Today you can purchase a Sansui 26-inch LCD high-definition TV (see picture above) on the Sears website for $249.98 (or choose from the several hundred other TVs available), which would be a “time cost” today of only 13.03 hours of work at today’s hourly wage of $19.19, for a 90 percent reduction in the cost of today’s HDTV compared to the 1958 model.

Finally, consider the equipment with the “best stereo sound” that Sears had to offer in 1958, which was advertised for sale in its Christmas catalog for $84.95 (see picture above), boasting that “You’ll be amazed at the ‘living sound’ you’ll hear on this newest development in portable phonographs. Four tubes per rectifier. Hear every note, every shading of tone.”

I don’t think anybody today would be too amazed at the sound quality of that 1958 “state-of-the-art” stereo equipment playing 45 and LP records of the day.  And certainly nobody would trade his or her iPod for that system, especially considering that the time cost of today’s iPod is only 12.25 hours of work at today’s average hourly wage (to earn $234.99 for a classic iPod), which is more than 71 percent cheaper in time cost than Sears’s best stereo equipment in 1958 (42.9 hours of work at $1.98 per hour).

Putting it all together, a typical American consumer in 1958 would have had to work for 185 hours (more than a month) at the average hourly wage of $1.98 to earn enough pre-tax income ($368) to purchase a toaster, a TV and a stereo system.  Today’s consumer working at the average wage of $19.19 would only have to work 26.6 hours (a little more than three days) to earn enough income ($511) to purchase a toaster, TV and iPod.  In other words: 4.64 weeks of work in 1958 vs. less than 3.5 days in 2012 for those three consumer products, and one could argue that today’s products (especially the iPod) are far superior to their 1958 counterparts.

If you’re not convinced that today’s consumers are better off than at any time in history, spend some time browsing the old Sears, Wards, and J.C. Penney’s Christmas catalogs available here back to the 1930s, convert those old retail prices into their “time cost” equivalent using that year’s prevailing hourly wage, and you’ll quickly see that there has never been a better time to be a holiday shopper and consumers than right now. For that, you can thank the “miracle of the marketplace,” which brings us better and cheaper consumer goods all the time.

 

4 posted on 12/21/2012 2:47:01 PM PST by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: virgil283

http://www.aei-ideas.org/2012/12/christmas-shopping-1958-vs-2012/

Article Link


5 posted on 12/21/2012 2:47:59 PM PST by libertarian27 (Check my profile page for the FReeper Online Cookbook 2011)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: virgil283

Unfortunately, a high-quality tube amplifier will run you at least several thousand dollars nowadays. Same thing for a good turntable, there’s not much I would recommend for under a thousand.


6 posted on 12/21/2012 2:53:57 PM PST by proxy_user
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: virgil283

One has to pay for quality...of life that is.


8 posted on 12/21/2012 2:57:45 PM PST by x1stcav (Breathe deep the gathering gloom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: virgil283
consider television sets, a fairly common holiday gift. In 1958, American holiday shoppers paid $269.95 for Sears’s “best 24-inch console TV”

Yeah, but think of the radiation from that TV compared to today's flat screens. Much more radiation per $.

Besides, they had cool transformers (weighing the same as a small car) that could later be used by ham radio operators.

/johnny

9 posted on 12/21/2012 3:02:41 PM PST by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: virgil283

In the late ‘50’s, true Hi-Fi (DIN 45500) was replaced by stereophonics, and high end systems produced superior analog sound, far better than today’s standard of 128bps digital.

While this was a difference that only really mattered to audiophiles, and only on high end systems, not the typical run of the mill record player, if you had the hearing for it, the difference was enormous.

Even today, audiophiles will still pay premium prices for limited edition vinyl recordings.


11 posted on 12/21/2012 3:02:44 PM PST by yefragetuwrabrumuy (Pennies and Nickels will NO LONGER be Minted as of 1/1/13 - Tim Geithner, US Treasury Sect)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: virgil283
Article 1 Section 8.

The Congress shall have power . . . To promote the progress of science and useful arts, by securing for limited times to authors and inventors the exclusive right to their respective writings and discoveries . . .

Compare with the person whom wire service journalism will style “progressive” today - s/he will oppose any new way of getting energy more economically. “Progressives” are regressive.
Queen Victoria was born in 1820 and died in 1901. An American secretary today would be ill-served to trade circumstances with Queen Victoria!! She had essentially nothing made of plastic, she had no ability to travel by air and no automobile worthy of the name, if any. And the health care she, and her husband, had would be considered third-world today.
And socialism is strictly an anti-progress doctrine, in that any progress must, initially, be unequally distributed. Until - as the examples I have cited illustrate - the progress ultimately gets incorporated into everyone’s standard of living.

12 posted on 12/21/2012 3:04:40 PM PST by conservatism_IS_compassion (The idea around which “liberalism" coheres is that NOTHING actually matters except PR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: virgil283

Somebody at AEI knows nearly nothing about music audio. An iPod doesn’t even have speakers or an amplifier. An appropriate comparison would be the cost of a 1958 component phonograph record player versus an iPod.

Second, everything about that 1958 set up is orders of magnitude better in quality of sound than an iPod. A tube amp today costs thousands, and just the needle on a good phonograph record play could cost more than you’d spend on an iPod. The digital files on iPod’s are samples of the original master tapes that lose way more fidelity than vinyl records usually do.


15 posted on 12/21/2012 3:09:59 PM PST by Behind the Blue Wall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: virgil283
I don’t think anybody today would be too amazed at the sound quality of that 1958 “state-of-the-art” stereo equipment playing 45 and LP records of the day. And certainly nobody would trade his or her iPod for that system

How about what's played over the Ipod as opposed to what's played on the phonograph? In a heartbeat, I would trade Bruno Mars, Justin Bieber or Snoop Doggy Dogg--or any of the pop stars of 2012--for The Interludes, Valerie Carr or the Bay Bops, from 1958. I contend that even Barbara & the Boys is far superior to any 21st century pop act.

16 posted on 12/21/2012 3:13:14 PM PST by Fiji Hill (i)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: virgil283

I don’t watch my TV, but if I wanted decent programming, I’d have to pay “rent”.


21 posted on 12/21/2012 3:37:04 PM PST by Does so (Dims don't think ... they PLOT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: virgil283

BFL


34 posted on 12/21/2012 5:56:53 PM PST by Skooz (Gabba Gabba we accept you we accept you one of us Gabba Gabba we accept you we accept you one of us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: virgil283
Consumer goods aside, all those who pine for the "good old days" of the 1950s would be clamoring to come back to the 21st Century within a day or so if they were actually transported back to that era Marty McFly style. Yes, you'd be looking for some eccentric white-haired man to rig up some contraption for you to take you back.

Take the state of medicine back then just for example. Heart disease or cancer were death sentences in 1958. Your doctor just told you to go home and settle your affairs. Today, you get a triple-bypass and you're back to work on Monday with the arteries of a 20-year-old man. Most cancers are treatable and have a survival rate will over 50%.

I had to get to Chicago on short notice recently. On the way to the airport, I booked my flight, my hotel and had a rental car waiting for me when I got there - all with a few taps on my mobile device. Once on the plane, I ordered a vodka tonic and had a choice of over 1,000 books and movies on my tablet to keep me occupied during the flight. Try doing that in 1958.

I can go on and on.

Nostalgia is a powerful thing. People tend to remember only the good things about the past and quickly forget what a mundane existence it was (compared to today).

Of course, our standard of living and way of life today will seem primitive to those looking back on us 60 years from now.

43 posted on 12/22/2012 6:48:32 AM PST by SamAdams76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson