[Behind Liberal Lines]

I’m with the cop on this one. Not only is the truck a distraction, but the lights could start coming off on the road and create a hazard.

[HiTech RedNeck]

That wouldn’t be a lighting violation though, but a loose-cargo violation.

[Reeses]

Those stupid silver alerts are a distraction. Your tax dollars going down the drain. Some local governments allow highway high intensity LED billboards now. Free speech is permitted when the local politburo gets their cut.

[chainsaw]

I’m with the cop on this one. Not only is the truck a distraction, but the lights could start coming off on the road and create a hazard.

Then there should be no Christmas decorations visable from the road any place.

[BwanaNdege]

“Police Lt. Joe Schroeder said the lights could prove a dangerous distraction for other drivers. “

But these same police have no problem at all with three of them stopping someone at night, all three of their vehicles have all strobes blazing, blinding passing traffic.

Hey, guys, just ONE of you is bad enough and lets us know you are there. Three is a serious DANGER, not just a distraction.

[MD Expat in PA]

I’m with the cop on this one. Not only is the truck a distraction, but the lights could start coming off on the road and create a hazard.

That and one of the biggest problems I would think be driving behind this truck, being distracted by all the lights and not “seeing” or more precisely discerning the truck’s brake lights or turn signals….boom…rear end accident in the making. If I were the driver of a vehicle and rear ended this guy, I think I could make a very good argument about not being at fault.