Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: butterdezillion
"blah blah blah Official Certification of Nomination blah blah blah"

Like I said, legally elected. The documents were deemed satisfactory. He was placed on the ballot of all 50 states, the Electoral Collegiate voted for him, certified by the US Congress and sworn in by the CJSCOTUS.

29 posted on 12/13/2012 1:48:12 PM PST by Usagi_yo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: Usagi_yo

Governor Thomas H. Moore, North Dakota, was removed from office for ineligibility shortly after being sworn into office and being certified by the state legislature.

Moore is not the only such example.

Obama can be removed even now by the simple expedient of the Republican Governors ordering the disqualification of their state’s Electors. Without the Electors from the Republican states, the Electoral College will not have the required number of Electors to constitute a Constitutional quorum. In the event the Electoral College lacks a Constitutional quorum, the election of the President reverts t the House of Representatives and the election of the Vice President reverts to the Senate.Under current circumstances, you would likely have a Republican President and a Democrat Vice President in January 203, and Obama would be out of office and out of power.


34 posted on 12/13/2012 2:21:48 PM PST by WhiskeyX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

To: Usagi_yo

You don’t get it. According to Hawaii law, what they’ve got has ZERO legal value and NEVER CAN have any legal value, without first being presented as evidence to a judicial or administrative person or body and having the probative value determined. Without seeing the actual complete record, there is not a soul on earth who can LAWFULLY claim Obama is eligible for anything.

IOW, if some SOS, Chief Justice, etc claims that Obama actually is eligible - without first going through the legal process to determine his actual birth facts - they are violating the Full Faith and Credit Clause of the US Constitution. They are overstepping the bounds of Hawaii law and thus overstepping the bounds of the US Constitution. The legal presumption is for regularity - that is, that the routine disclosure by Onaka was done in compliance with the law and Obama thus has no legally-established birth facts - without which he CANNOT “qualify” as required by the 20th Amendment of the Constitution

That means that the entire election was fraudulent - in 2008 and in 2012. The whole thing. Even without all the actual voter fraud that took place.


40 posted on 12/13/2012 4:44:07 PM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson