[Beave Meister]

Does this really surprise anyone anymore.....Is their anyone at Time over the age of 16 who is in charge of making decisions. They wonder why their subscription base has dwindled to rock bottom levels.

[silverleaf]

D’Oh! Maybe they all though he was that “Psy” guy
Oppan Gangnam Style!

Or maybe Time readers appreciate his family’s tradition of gulags to keep progressives in power

[E. Pluribus Unum]

Is this the same Kim Jong Un who was voted the sexiest man alive by The Onion recently?

[BitWielder1]

Okay, who "Freeped" that poll?

[Eric in the Ozarks]

Time’s up.

[John W]

This is the reader-and I use that term loosely-poll. The actual winner picked by Time will probably be even more disappointing, Obama.

[Texas Eagle]

TIME is still being published???

[Flycatcher]

TIME’s completely unscientific reader Person of the Year Poll

What do you mean, "unscientific"?

This frivolous poll probably has more real scientific backing than any global-warming model of the last ten years.

[Conscience of a Conservative]

Time’s “Person of the Year” is not an honor. It doesn’t mean “Best Person of the Year,” it means (essentially) “Most Significant Person of the Year.” So, if a terrible person happens to have a tremendous influence on world events (e.g., when Hitler was “Person of the Year” back during WWII), they may be named “Person of the Year”, but they are not being “honored” as such.

Not, saying that Kim Jong Un is the right pick, just pointing out that getting offended about the Person of the Year thing is misplaced (and silly - really, who cares?)

[muawiyah]

Un is beating out Fluke ~ sending her a message Fur Shur.

[Arthur McGowan]

I think it should be the Georgetown Slut herself. Reminder: Hitler was Man of the Year at least once. She turned out to be a huge influence on Obama’s base of sluts and slugs.

[Fiji Hill]

They should pick Candy Crowley, who saved Obama’s presidency when she kibitzed in the debate.

[Oztrich Boy]

Your reading comprehension would make the Baby Jesus cry.