Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: svcw
The babies will not born at the same time, one always arrives first.

If they are twins, and if one is a boy and one is a girl (that's a lot of IFs) I wonder if the palace will have a quiet chat with the doctor a week or so before the birth and indicate that the official order of birth shall be Boy - Girl.

Yes, a girl born first would legally take the throne, but it would be an odd precedent. If (officially) the Boy is considered to have been born first, then there is no issue or hard feelings down the line.

31 posted on 12/04/2012 7:43:16 AM PST by ClearCase_guy (Global Warming is a religion, and I don't want to be taxed to pay for a faith that is not mine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: ClearCase_guy

hum? That is interesting.
Yes, the rules have been changed, but it would be easier for the first time this happens by not complicating it with twins where the girl is born first.
I am guessing there is a good chance she is carrying multiples, because of how sever her morning sickness is and the older you get the greater the chances of twins.
I wish her well, I can’t imagine being pregnant under a royal microscope.


35 posted on 12/04/2012 7:50:40 AM PST by svcw (Why is one cell on another planet considered life, and in the womb it is not.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

To: ClearCase_guy

Though there may have been fewer of them, I’d say that on average England’s queens have outperformed their kings.


60 posted on 12/04/2012 11:22:59 AM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson