Replies

He does not have all those scuds to use against rebels. Those scuds are for Turkey, Jordan and Israel. For the life of me I cannot understand this US intervention policy. You do not back the man into a corner, draw a red line and then get all upset when 10,000's of citizens get killed from the worlds most advanced chemical and biological WMD's, when the red line is crossed. The proper way to handle this was the GWB way. You use a coalition with overwhelming force to handle any possible WMD situations. The current US policy can only result in the use of Assad's chemical and biological WMD. Either by Assad. His loyalists. Or by the rebels and terrorists who gain control of the weapons.

This also brings up the possibility that the US was planning these terrorist led insurgency type interventions years ago. Would explain the insanity of claiming Saddam had no WMD, after the UN spent close to 10 years destroying thousands of WMD components in Iraq. The entire left and most of the US populace was duped into not being concerned about WMD's in the middle East. That has allowed the Interventionists to work their dark magic in Libya, Egypt and now Syria. And the left is too stupid to ever even realize they were played on WMD in Iraq. Just as they are being played on CO2 in the atmosphere. IMHO.