Is This Why Americans Have Lost The Drive To "Earn" More

ZeroHedge ^ | 12/01 | Tyler Durden

[ExxonPatrolUs]

Full Zero Hedge Article At This Link

In the recent past we noted [6] the somewhat startling reality that "the single mom is better off earning gross income of $29,000 with $57,327 in net income & benefits than to earn gross income of $69,000 with net income and benefits of $57,045." While mathematics is our tool - as opposed to the mathemagics of some of the more politically biased media who did not like our message - the painful reality in America is that: for increasingly more Americans it is now more lucrative - in the form of actual disposable income - to sit, do nothing, and collect various welfare entitlements, than to work. This is such an important topic that we felt it necessary to warrant a second look. The graphic below quite clearly, and very painfully, confirms that there is an earnings vacuum of around $40k in which US workers are perfectly ambivalent toward inputting more effort since it does not result in any additional incremental disposable income. With the ongoing 'fiscal cliff' battles over taxes and entitlements, this is a problematic finding, since - as a result - it is the US government that will have to keep funding indirectly this lost productivity and worker output (via wealth redistribution).

As we noted before (details below):

We realize that this is a painful topic in a country in which the issue of welfare benefits, and cutting (or not) the spending side of the fiscal cliff, have become the two most sensitive social topics. Alas, none of that changes the matrix of incentives for most Americans who find themselves in a comparable situation: either being on the left side of minimum US wage, and relying on benefits, or move to the right side at far greater personal investment of work, and energy, and... have the same disposable income at the end of the day.

Naturally, the topic of wealth redistribution is paramount one now that America is entering the terminal phase of its out of control spending, and whose response to hike taxes in a globalized, easily fungible world, will merely force more of the uber-wealthy to find offshore tax jurisdictions, avoid US taxation altogether, and thus result in even lower budget revenues for the US. It explains why the cluelessly incompetent but supposedly impartial Congressional Budget Office just released a key paper titled "Share of Returns Filed by Low- and Moderate-Income Workers, by Marginal Tax Rate, Under 2012 Law [8]" which carries a chart of disposable income by net income comparable to the one above.

But perhaps the scariest chart in the entire presentation is the following summarizing the unsustainable welfare burden on current taxpayers:
•For every 1.65 employed persons in the private sector, 1 person receives welfare assistance
•For every 1.25 employed persons in the private sector, 1 person receives welfare assistance or works for the government.

The punchline: 110 million privately employed workers; 88 million welfare recipients and government workers and rising rapidly.

And since nothing has changed in the past two years, and in fact the situation has gotten progressively (pardon the pun) worse, here is our conclusion on this topic from two years ago [11]:

We have been writing for over a year, how the very top of America's social order steals from the middle class each and every day. Now we finally know that the very bottom of the entitlement food chain also makes out like a bandit compared to that idiot American who actually works and pays their taxes. One can only also hope that in addition to seeing their disposable income be eaten away by a kleptocratic entitlement state, that the disappearing middle class is also selling off its weaponry. Because if it isn't, and if it finally decides it has had enough, the outcome will not be surprising at all: it will be the same old that has occurred in virtually every revolution in the history of the world to date.

But for now, just stick head in sand, and pretend all is good. Self-deception is now the only thing left for the entire insolvent entitlement-addicted world.

* * *

Full must read presentation: "Welfare's Failure and the Solution"

[EVO X]

Will the government seize my 401(k)? Will my retirement be any better than my neighbor’s

My guess is that SS will be means tested at some point, so you won't be any better off.

[Smokin' Joe]

This is all part of the equal opportunity equals equal outcome nonsense that has been bandied about. That concept needs to be defeated, but it will be hard when we bail out huge banks...with taxpayer money.

We're writing bad checks for the future to cash to support those who will not support themselves. There is no reason why those who will not work should live better than those who support them.

[Cronos]

Depends on some factors -- you may have more people in your family, you may be supporting more charities, more people (extended relations etc.)

And, you most likely have proper fiscal sense -- saving money, not living on credit

The people you mention may be blowing away their money and living on credit

[Cronos]

I believe, or like to believe, that not all the 50% on dole like being there and many would welcome an opportunity to leave it.

[EVO X]

This is all part of the equal opportunity equals equal outcome nonsense that has been bandied about. That concept needs to be defeated, but it will be hard when we bail out huge banks...with taxpayer money.

It will be defeated sooner or later. At some point economics will get in the way. We see that going on in Europe right now..